BTC $84,796.44 +0.27%
ETH $2,692.07 +0.58%
BNB $783.18 +1.98%
XRP $1.49 +0.20%
SOL $120.36 +1.22%
TRX $0.3353 +0.31%
DOGE $0.0926 -0.42%
ADA $0.2429 -1.61%
BCH $317.62 +1.73%
LINK $14.04 +0.75%
HYPE $89.58 +1.59%
AAVE $182.09 +0.43%
SUI $1.17 +1.45%
XLM $0.2150 -0.34%
ZEC $1,307.17 -1.38%
AAPL $333.33 -0.04%
AMZN $252.35 +0.25%
GOOGL $343.84 +0.07%
MSFT $517.78 +0.04%
META $730.81 +0.49%
NVDA $234.57 +0.12%
TSLA $371.57 +0.15%
SNDK $1,716.00 -0.23%
INTC $117.27 -1.22%
SPCX $158.84 0.00%
MU $1,066.49 -0.14%
AMD $634.02 -0.11%
BTC $84,796.44 +0.27%
ETH $2,692.07 +0.58%
BNB $783.18 +1.98%
XRP $1.49 +0.20%
SOL $120.36 +1.22%
TRX $0.3353 +0.31%
DOGE $0.0926 -0.42%
ADA $0.2429 -1.61%
BCH $317.62 +1.73%
LINK $14.04 +0.75%
HYPE $89.58 +1.59%
AAVE $182.09 +0.43%
SUI $1.17 +1.45%
XLM $0.2150 -0.34%
ZEC $1,307.17 -1.38%
AAPL $333.33 -0.04%
AMZN $252.35 +0.25%
GOOGL $343.84 +0.07%
MSFT $517.78 +0.04%
META $730.81 +0.49%
NVDA $234.57 +0.12%
TSLA $371.57 +0.15%
SNDK $1,716.00 -0.23%
INTC $117.27 -1.22%
SPCX $158.84 0.00%
MU $1,066.49 -0.14%
AMD $634.02 -0.11%

南昌高新开发区法院:虚拟货币借款纠纷不属民事诉讼受理范围

2023-10-10 19:11:54

ChainCatcher 消息,据南昌高新技术产业开发区人民法院,南昌高新法院公布了一起案例,原告小明(化名)诉称,2021 年 4 月,被告小刚(化名)以炒 USDT 币为由向其借款,并称承诺六个月之内保证还清原告的借款。而后小明将人民币 55 万余元兑换成 8 万余枚 USDT 币向小刚提供借款。但约定时间过后,小刚未依约还款,小明遂向法院提起诉讼。

南昌高新法院经审理认为,人民法院受理民事案件应属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。本案中原告小明起诉时未能证明本案所涉 USDT 泰达币是依法公开发行的货币,故不具有法偿性。由此引发的诉讼不属于人民法院受理民事诉讼的范围。一审裁定,驳回原告小明的起诉。小明不服,于是向二审法院提起上诉。最终,二审裁定,驳回上诉,维持原裁定。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界