Scan to download
BTC $75,156.25 +0.60%
ETH $2,354.56 +0.06%
BNB $635.95 +2.22%
XRP $1.46 +4.95%
SOL $89.14 +5.01%
TRX $0.3270 +0.00%
DOGE $0.0995 +5.16%
ADA $0.2599 +5.84%
BCH $456.32 +3.74%
LINK $9.58 +3.66%
HYPE $43.99 -1.26%
AAVE $115.70 +10.10%
SUI $1.00 +5.03%
XLM $0.1689 +7.36%
ZEC $339.15 -1.75%
BTC $75,156.25 +0.60%
ETH $2,354.56 +0.06%
BNB $635.95 +2.22%
XRP $1.46 +4.95%
SOL $89.14 +5.01%
TRX $0.3270 +0.00%
DOGE $0.0995 +5.16%
ADA $0.2599 +5.84%
BCH $456.32 +3.74%
LINK $9.58 +3.66%
HYPE $43.99 -1.26%
AAVE $115.70 +10.10%
SUI $1.00 +5.03%
XLM $0.1689 +7.36%
ZEC $339.15 -1.75%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.