Scan to download
BTC $60,731.49 -1.90%
ETH $1,558.08 -5.86%
BNB $572.80 -2.73%
XRP $1.08 -2.88%
SOL $62.30 -5.03%
TRX $0.3192 -1.86%
DOGE $0.0811 -2.58%
ADA $0.1555 -3.65%
BCH $216.26 -1.91%
LINK $7.30 -2.68%
HYPE $59.19 -4.04%
AAVE $61.39 -5.80%
SUI $0.7013 -0.35%
XLM $0.1991 +5.82%
ZEC $360.52 +17.69%
BTC $60,731.49 -1.90%
ETH $1,558.08 -5.86%
BNB $572.80 -2.73%
XRP $1.08 -2.88%
SOL $62.30 -5.03%
TRX $0.3192 -1.86%
DOGE $0.0811 -2.58%
ADA $0.1555 -3.65%
BCH $216.26 -1.91%
LINK $7.30 -2.68%
HYPE $59.19 -4.04%
AAVE $61.39 -5.80%
SUI $0.7013 -0.35%
XLM $0.1991 +5.82%
ZEC $360.52 +17.69%

Vitalik: For an L2-centric ecosystem to succeed, it is essential to understand and address challenges such as coordination

2024-05-23 13:04:33
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated that Layer 2 and sharding are often described as two opposing strategies for blockchain scalability in public discussions. However, when you delve into the underlying technology, a puzzle emerges: the actual scaling methods are completely the same. Both have some form of data sharding, both have fraud proofs or ZK-SNARK proofs, and both have methods to solve cross {rollup, shard} communication. The main difference lies in who is responsible for building and updating these components, and how much autonomy they possess.

A Layer 2-centric ecosystem technically realizes sharding very effectively, but it is a sharding that can create its own rules. This is very powerful and can inspire a great deal of creativity and independent innovation. However, it also presents key challenges, especially in terms of coordination. For a Layer 2-centric ecosystem like Ethereum to succeed, it needs to understand these challenges and address them head-on to gain as many advantages as possible from a Layer 1-centric ecosystem while getting as close as possible to having the best features of both.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.