BTC $62,960.60 -0.10%
ETH $1,878.23 -0.28%
BNB $606.04 -0.21%
XRP $0.9997 -0.45%
SOL $75.26 -0.29%
TRX $0.3310 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0695 -0.89%
ADA $0.1761 -2.37%
BCH $203.32 -0.97%
LINK $9.46 -0.88%
HYPE $56.88 +0.82%
AAVE $85.98 -0.62%
SUI $0.6738 -1.66%
XLM $0.1568 -1.43%
ZEC $484.79 -2.19%
BTC $62,960.60 -0.10%
ETH $1,878.23 -0.28%
BNB $606.04 -0.21%
XRP $0.9997 -0.45%
SOL $75.26 -0.29%
TRX $0.3310 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0695 -0.89%
ADA $0.1761 -2.37%
BCH $203.32 -0.97%
LINK $9.46 -0.88%
HYPE $56.88 +0.82%
AAVE $85.98 -0.62%
SUI $0.6738 -1.66%
XLM $0.1568 -1.43%
ZEC $484.79 -2.19%

Vitalik: "The financialized pseudonymous society" is not truly effective; governance structures require a more multidimensional concept of identity

2024-08-22 12:54:39

ChainCatcher message, Vitalik posted on X: "I believe that 'anonymous society', and even 'financialized pseudonymous society', is not really effective. A more multidimensional concept of identity (characterized by 'soulbinding') seems necessary; if you don't do this, the most stable governance structure will just be a de facto centralized structure, and others will be attacked by financialized governance. It can be said that even today, we can see these issues at play in DAOs.

Anonymity is a check and balance, its existence is to run the 'dark side of the cycle', but it itself cannot run the entire cycle. Just as you cannot operate a society with perpetual rebellious energy.

Regarding x-risk, I believe that diverse thinking can actually help us more effectively identify x-risk mitigation measures that people can support."

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.