BTC $85,218.67 +0.41%
ETH $2,697.74 +0.60%
BNB $789.96 +2.13%
XRP $1.50 +1.24%
SOL $121.62 +1.88%
TRX $0.3357 +0.00%
DOGE $0.0935 +0.87%
ADA $0.2457 +0.41%
BCH $319.08 +2.41%
LINK $14.11 +1.73%
HYPE $90.02 +1.71%
AAVE $179.41 -1.00%
SUI $1.18 +0.76%
XLM $0.2158 +0.39%
ZEC $1,329.40 +2.13%
AAPL $333.34 +0.04%
AMZN $252.52 +0.27%
GOOGL $344.04 +0.26%
MSFT $517.54 +0.03%
META $729.81 +0.24%
NVDA $234.62 +0.11%
TSLA $372.46 +0.41%
SNDK $1,719.53 +0.15%
INTC $118.94 +0.81%
SPCX $159.13 +0.01%
MU $1,069.72 +0.02%
AMD $633.03 +0.13%
BTC $85,218.67 +0.41%
ETH $2,697.74 +0.60%
BNB $789.96 +2.13%
XRP $1.50 +1.24%
SOL $121.62 +1.88%
TRX $0.3357 +0.00%
DOGE $0.0935 +0.87%
ADA $0.2457 +0.41%
BCH $319.08 +2.41%
LINK $14.11 +1.73%
HYPE $90.02 +1.71%
AAVE $179.41 -1.00%
SUI $1.18 +0.76%
XLM $0.2158 +0.39%
ZEC $1,329.40 +2.13%
AAPL $333.34 +0.04%
AMZN $252.52 +0.27%
GOOGL $344.04 +0.26%
MSFT $517.54 +0.03%
META $729.81 +0.24%
NVDA $234.62 +0.11%
TSLA $372.46 +0.41%
SNDK $1,719.53 +0.15%
INTC $118.94 +0.81%
SPCX $159.13 +0.01%
MU $1,069.72 +0.02%
AMD $633.03 +0.13%

Slow Fog: If Bybit upgrades the Safe contract to version 1.3.0 or higher and implements an appropriate Guard mechanism, it may avoid the theft of 1.5 billion dollars in assets

2025-02-26 16:49:20

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist stated that on February 21, 2025, Bybit's on-chain multi-signature wallet was targeted and breached, with nearly $1.5 billion in assets quietly lost through a transaction with a "legitimate signature." Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that the attacker gained multi-signature permissions through sophisticated social engineering attacks, implanted malicious logic using the delegatecall function of the Safe contract, and ultimately bypassed the multi-signature verification mechanism to transfer funds to an anonymous address. "Multi-signature" does not equal "absolute security"; even a secure mechanism like the Safe multi-signature wallet can still be at risk of being compromised if lacking additional protective measures.

Bybit is using version v1.1.1 (<1.3.0) of the Safe contract, which means they cannot utilize the Guard mechanism, a key security feature. If Bybit had upgraded to version 1.3.0 or higher of the Safe contract and implemented an appropriate Guard mechanism, such as specifying a whitelist address for receiving funds and conducting strict contract function ACL verification, they might have been able to avoid this loss. Although this is merely a hypothesis, it provides important insights for future asset security management.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.