BTC $63,132.85 +0.15%
ETH $1,884.77 +0.13%
BNB $605.57 -0.68%
XRP $1.00 -0.19%
SOL $75.22 -0.34%
TRX $0.3315 +0.03%
DOGE $0.0699 +0.08%
ADA $0.1786 +0.55%
BCH $203.68 +0.09%
LINK $9.44 -1.46%
HYPE $57.77 +0.88%
AAVE $86.79 +0.26%
SUI $0.6774 -0.47%
XLM $0.1577 +0.00%
ZEC $490.99 +0.26%
BTC $63,132.85 +0.15%
ETH $1,884.77 +0.13%
BNB $605.57 -0.68%
XRP $1.00 -0.19%
SOL $75.22 -0.34%
TRX $0.3315 +0.03%
DOGE $0.0699 +0.08%
ADA $0.1786 +0.55%
BCH $203.68 +0.09%
LINK $9.44 -1.46%
HYPE $57.77 +0.88%
AAVE $86.79 +0.26%
SUI $0.6774 -0.47%
XLM $0.1577 +0.00%
ZEC $490.99 +0.26%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.