Scan to download
BTC $77,315.24 +3.40%
ETH $2,424.56 +3.86%
BNB $646.28 +2.24%
XRP $1.48 +3.04%
SOL $89.11 +0.72%
TRX $0.3270 +0.17%
DOGE $0.0994 +0.79%
ADA $0.2587 +0.67%
BCH $454.55 +0.40%
LINK $9.63 +1.53%
HYPE $45.14 +3.11%
AAVE $115.31 +1.27%
SUI $0.9981 +0.20%
XLM $0.1736 +3.62%
ZEC $336.63 -1.20%
BTC $77,315.24 +3.40%
ETH $2,424.56 +3.86%
BNB $646.28 +2.24%
XRP $1.48 +3.04%
SOL $89.11 +0.72%
TRX $0.3270 +0.17%
DOGE $0.0994 +0.79%
ADA $0.2587 +0.67%
BCH $454.55 +0.40%
LINK $9.63 +1.53%
HYPE $45.14 +3.11%
AAVE $115.31 +1.27%
SUI $0.9981 +0.20%
XLM $0.1736 +3.62%
ZEC $336.63 -1.20%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.