Scan to download
BTC $77,130.57 +2.96%
ETH $2,410.69 +3.43%
BNB $643.94 +2.46%
XRP $1.47 +2.63%
SOL $88.55 +0.42%
TRX $0.3274 +0.44%
DOGE $0.0988 +1.06%
ADA $0.2579 +1.23%
BCH $454.06 +0.93%
LINK $9.61 +2.17%
HYPE $44.89 +2.53%
AAVE $114.99 +1.32%
SUI $1.00 +2.06%
XLM $0.1744 +4.92%
ZEC $335.71 +0.10%
BTC $77,130.57 +2.96%
ETH $2,410.69 +3.43%
BNB $643.94 +2.46%
XRP $1.47 +2.63%
SOL $88.55 +0.42%
TRX $0.3274 +0.44%
DOGE $0.0988 +1.06%
ADA $0.2579 +1.23%
BCH $454.06 +0.93%
LINK $9.61 +2.17%
HYPE $44.89 +2.53%
AAVE $114.99 +1.32%
SUI $1.00 +2.06%
XLM $0.1744 +4.92%
ZEC $335.71 +0.10%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.