Scan to download
BTC $62,081.79 +2.38%
ETH $1,631.74 +4.82%
BNB $595.79 +3.77%
XRP $1.12 +5.53%
SOL $65.08 +5.53%
TRX $0.3274 +1.64%
DOGE $0.0844 +4.59%
ADA $0.1623 +3.48%
BCH $224.64 +4.86%
LINK $7.72 +5.59%
HYPE $58.88 +3.57%
AAVE $62.56 +3.39%
SUI $0.7441 +5.01%
XLM $0.2061 -0.86%
ZEC $414.29 +16.04%
BTC $62,081.79 +2.38%
ETH $1,631.74 +4.82%
BNB $595.79 +3.77%
XRP $1.12 +5.53%
SOL $65.08 +5.53%
TRX $0.3274 +1.64%
DOGE $0.0844 +4.59%
ADA $0.1623 +3.48%
BCH $224.64 +4.86%
LINK $7.72 +5.59%
HYPE $58.88 +3.57%
AAVE $62.56 +3.39%
SUI $0.7441 +5.01%
XLM $0.2061 -0.86%
ZEC $414.29 +16.04%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.