Scan to download
BTC $70,648.24 -1.13%
ETH $2,078.07 -1.00%
BNB $653.91 -1.43%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $459.68 -1.13%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%
BTC $70,648.24 -1.13%
ETH $2,078.07 -1.00%
BNB $653.91 -1.43%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $459.68 -1.13%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%

ZachXBT: WLFI should carefully label high-risk addresses, as false positives can cause irreparable damage to reputation

2025-09-07 17:44:21
Collection

ChainCatcher message, "on-chain detective" ZachXBT posted on the X platform: "Sometimes so-called high-risk addresses may be incorrect, so the WLFI team cannot simply rely on compliance tools. Recently, I helped a team manually review the addresses of a presale, and after manual review, it was found that certain exchanges/smart contracts were incorrectly labeled as high risk. In many cases, even top compliance tools have significant flaws. I am glad to see that the World Liberty Financial team has taken a more proactive approach than other teams like Circle, as this will ultimately benefit the victims, but they do need to be cautious; otherwise, if false positives are blacklisted, it could cause irreparable damage to their reputation. The difficult part is finding the balance, and if the address is indeed a false positive, I hope the issue can be resolved quickly."

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.