Scan to download
BTC $61,559.31 -3.44%
ETH $1,598.18 -9.89%
BNB $577.39 -4.25%
XRP $1.11 -5.33%
SOL $64.50 -5.87%
TRX $0.3211 -3.18%
DOGE $0.0827 -6.34%
ADA $0.1593 -12.47%
BCH $215.36 -12.12%
LINK $7.45 -6.79%
HYPE $59.77 -7.18%
AAVE $63.36 -10.78%
SUI $0.7125 -7.76%
XLM $0.2049 +1.27%
ZEC $369.60 -21.05%
BTC $61,559.31 -3.44%
ETH $1,598.18 -9.89%
BNB $577.39 -4.25%
XRP $1.11 -5.33%
SOL $64.50 -5.87%
TRX $0.3211 -3.18%
DOGE $0.0827 -6.34%
ADA $0.1593 -12.47%
BCH $215.36 -12.12%
LINK $7.45 -6.79%
HYPE $59.77 -7.18%
AAVE $63.36 -10.78%
SUI $0.7125 -7.76%
XLM $0.2049 +1.27%
ZEC $369.60 -21.05%
first_img

CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

2026-05-28 10:12:12
Collection

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.

The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.

The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.

The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.