address

According to CoinDesk, an address from the "Satoshi era" that has never been used since March 2011, holding 35.55 bitcoins (approximately $2.54 million), made a transfer this week, which is seen as one of the first publicly visible responses from defendants in a lawsuit involving approximately 3.8 million bitcoins (valued at about $285 billion) in New York.On-chain data shows that the address transferred 15 BTC to a new address on June 2, keeping the remaining 20.55 BTC as change. The address initially received bitcoins on March 27, 2011, when the price of BTC was less than $1.In March of this year, a plaintiff using the pseudonym "Noah Doe" filed a lawsuit in New York state court alongside two LLCs from Wyoming, attempting to claim ownership of approximately 3.8 million long-dormant bitcoin wallets under New York's lost property law, positioning themselves as the "discoverer." The court approved sending on-chain notifications to the relevant wallets via the bitcoin OP_RETURN field.In July 2025, the advisory firm Salomon Brothers Strategic Advisors sent dust transactions with links to legal notices to 39,000 wallets, including the aforementioned address, requesting holders to prove ownership within 90 days.Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Research, pointed out that the address corresponds to defendant number 38215 in the case, stating, "Clearly, these bitcoins have not actually been abandoned."Additionally, another address that had been dormant for 15 years, 1CDSyXAQxro4FPUoqAQb81642ruqDsUiNp, also transferred 20 BTC (approximately $1.48 million) on the same day, but this address did not appear on Noah Doe's list of lawsuits.Analysis suggests that the on-chain movements mentioned above indicate that some bitcoins from the Satoshi era, considered "abandoned assets," are actually still under the control of the original holders.

According to monitoring by Onchain Lens, a newly created address withdrew 6.5 million Binance Coin, worth 4.4 million USD, and currently holds 17.5 million Binance Coin, worth 11.87 million USD.

According to monitoring by Lookonchain, the BIT associated address currently holds a floating loss of 78 million dollars on a long position of 120,000 ETH. To avoid liquidation, it deposited 5.84 million USDC as collateral.The latest liquidation prices on the whale's four addresses are: $1,414.51, $1,366.11, $1,360.73, and $1,309.53.

According to Yu Jin, a whale borrowed approximately 44.42 million USDT through two addresses on Aave to leverage buy 25,851 ETH, with an entry price of about $1,718 per coin. One of the addresses has a position health of 1.23, corresponding to a liquidation price of about $1,355.

According to the Securities Times, Xiaohongshu has launched a special governance action for certified professional accounts in the financial sector starting from June 3. Based on relevant laws and regulations as well as platform rules, financial certifications are only issued to institutions holding compliant licenses. The nicknames of certified professional accounts on the platform must strictly match the actual business scope of the certified entity and must not obtain certification marks through false or misleading information. In the past week, Xiaohongshu has dealt with over 1,500 non-compliant financial professional accounts and will continue to comprehensively strengthen the public verification and validation mechanism, conducting regular inspections and handling of existing accounts.Staff introduced that since May, the Xiaohongshu platform has dealt with a total of 31,000 accounts involved in financial sector violations and marketing accounts without financial-related qualifications, including 539 notes and 146 comments related to illegal inducement of cross-border investment issues; 141 related notes regarding the low-priced resale of foreign investment bank research reports, and freezing of 132 related products. In addition, the platform has also handled over 130 pieces of suspected illegal information related to gold financial marketing promotion and domestic promotion of overseas platforms.

The cryptocurrency project World Liberty Financial (WLFI), supported by the Trump family, stated that in light of recent updates to sanctions measures, WLFI maintains a risk-based sanctions compliance control mechanism to support legal and regulatory obligations applicable within relevant jurisdictions. Transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or related wallet addresses may face enhanced scrutiny, denial, restrictions, or other appropriate compliance measures.Users should ensure that the source of funds and the original wallet address are not related to sanctioned individuals or prohibited activities when transferring digital assets. If transactions or accounts are affected during the compliance review process, its support team will assist users in taking subsequent steps.

Santiment released data on social media stating that Bitcoin has dropped 13% in the past week, primarily attributed to the selling behavior of key stakeholders. Bitcoin whales and sharks (addresses holding 10 to 10,000 BTC) sold 24,602 Bitcoins in the past week (a reduction of 18%). Bitcoin small traders (addresses holding less than 0.01 BTC) increased their holdings by 61 Bitcoins in the past week (an increase of 12%).

According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, well-known ETH bull James Fickel (@jamesfickel) transferred 10,000 ETH ($18.62 million) from a Coinbase custody address to a deposit address, possibly for trading.This marks his return to executing large asset deposit operations at the million-dollar level after six months. He currently holds 38,936.13 ETH on-chain, with a total value of $72.43 million.

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, a newly created address withdrew 810.3 BTC from Binance through multiple wallets, worth approximately 54.11 million USD.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin (@EmberCN), Tether's BTC reserve address transferred 204.3 BTC to Bitfinex 3 hours ago, worth approximately 14.36 million USD.Since 2023, this address has continuously purchased BTC using 15% of the company's profits, currently holding a total of 96,936 BTC, worth approximately 6.72 billion USD, making it the fifth largest BTC wallet. Based on the price when it was withdrawn from Bitfinex, the average purchase price of this batch of BTC is about 51,312 USD, currently yielding a profit of approximately 1.75 billion USD.

According to monitoring by Lookonchain, a certain address, after being inactive for more than 5 years, deposited 86,481 ETH into Bitfinex, worth 171.57 million USD. This operation may only be a transfer between internal wallets of Bitfinex.

According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, the Fenbushi Capital associated address (0xaF3...74446) transferred 11,101 ETH to the Amber Group recharge address 8 hours ago, valued at 21.94 million USD, with a transfer price of 1,977.24 USD.Tracing back shows that the address withdrew a total of 33,398 ETH from Binance between February 2024 and April 2024 at an average price of 3,039.36 USD, with a total value of approximately 101 million USD; based on the current transfer price, if the aforementioned 11,101 ETH were sold, it would incur a loss of 11.79 million USD.

Galaxy stated that in March this year, the New York State Supreme Court quietly accepted a lawsuit aimed at confirming the ownership of over 3.7 million bitcoins (approximately $274 billion) associated with 39,069 bitcoin addresses, including addresses belonging to bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto (a total of 21,744 addresses holding 1.09 million bitcoins, valued at $83.7 billion at current prices).The plaintiffs are Noah Doe (a pseudonym) and two unnamed limited liability companies from Wyoming. Noah Doe requests the New York State Supreme Court to declare their ownership of these dormant addresses through a declaratory judgment action under New York State's lost property law (Section 7-B of the Personal Property Law) as per the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3001.In short, they are attempting to have the New York court rule that the bitcoins of bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto (and many other lost address bitcoins) belong to lost property, and that they have the right to legally own them because they "found" these cryptocurrencies. From June 30 to July 10, 2025, they sent "abandonment notices" via OP_RETURN to each found address.However, even if they win completely, they will ultimately only receive a court statement; they will not obtain any private keys and will not be able to transfer any bitcoins from these addresses. But Galaxy indicates that the real value of the New York ruling lies in its potential to serve as a "title defect," allowing plaintiff Noah Doe to raise objections with exchanges or custodians if these bitcoins appear in any regulated venue.

Galaxy stated that in March this year, the New York State Supreme Court quietly accepted a lawsuit aimed at confirming the ownership of over 3.7 million bitcoins (approximately $27.4 billion) associated with 39,069 bitcoin addresses, including addresses belonging to bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto (a total of 21,744 addresses holding 1.09 million bitcoins, valued at $83.7 billion at current prices).The plaintiffs are Noah Doe (a pseudonym) and two unnamed limited liability companies from Wyoming. Noah Doe requests the New York State Supreme Court to declare their ownership of these dormant addresses through a declaratory judgment action under New York State's lost property law (Section 7-B of the Personal Property Law) as per the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3001.In short, they are trying to have the New York court rule that the bitcoins of bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto (and many other lost address bitcoins) belong to lost property, and they claim the right to legally own them because they "found" these cryptocurrencies. From June 30 to July 10, 2025, they sent "abandonment notices" via OP_RETURN to each found address. However, even if they win completely, they will only receive a court statement; they will not obtain any private keys and will not be able to transfer any bitcoins from these addresses.But Galaxy indicated that the real value of the New York ruling lies in its potential to serve as a "title defect." If these bitcoins appear in any regulated venue, the plaintiff Noah Doe can use this document to raise objections with exchanges or custodians.

According to on-chain analyst Ai Yi's monitoring, the new address 0x82C...2ebD1 withdrew 5 million USDT and 0.5 BNB in miner fees from Bybit 17 hours ago, and then purchased 8.1 million Binance Life at an average price of $0.61417, holding 0.81% of the token chips, becoming a TOP 20 holder on-chain.This buying behavior drove the price up by 32% (from $0.5314 to $0.702), and it has now fallen back to $0.6246, with a 24-hour increase of 25%.

According to analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, a certain address has withdrawn 60.87 million WLFI from Binance to the blockchain in the past two days, worth approximately 3.55 million USD, with an average price of 0.058 USD.

According to Bloomberg, European Central Bank Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel stated that stablecoins pose multiple risks to financial stability and monetary policy, and the best response from the European Central Bank is to ensure that public money continues to serve as the anchor of the system.She pointed out that while private monetary innovations like stablecoins can bring "significant benefits," they may also increase the risk of runs on the financial system, weaken the transmission effects of interest rate decisions, and reinforce the international dominance of the dollar. Schnabel emphasized that the European Central Bank's strategy relies on the digital euro as a retail central bank digital currency and tokenized central bank money as wholesale CBDC.She noted that many advantages of stablecoins stem from their underlying technology rather than the characteristics of the instruments themselves. The day before Schnabel's remarks, Federal Reserve Governor Waller stated that the global spread of stablecoins could expand the influence of U.S. central bank policies and questioned CBDCs, calling them "a stupid thing."

The Huobi HTX VIP private class "AI + Trading from Theory to Practice" was held in Shanghai, where early Bitcoin miner and pyra.io CTO Tian Jia shared the development of quantum computing and the impact of AI on trading.He believes that the average time it takes to threaten "Bitcoin addresses with exposed public keys" is 7 to 8 years, with a range of 5 to 15 years. The required number of logical qubits is between 1200 and 2400, while the number of physical qubits is less than 500,000. Additionally, Bitcoin also has defensive measures; it can migrate to PQC, or post-quantum cryptography, although there are significant challenges, such as the locking issue of Satoshi's coin.

According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, an address suspected to belong to Dragonfly transferred 137 million SKY (9.05 million USD) into Coinbase. This SKY was likely withdrawn from Binance about 5 years ago (August 2021) when it was still MKR, valued at 20.45 million USD, having shrunk by more than half.

Superfortune, incubated by Manta, recently released an update on the X platform regarding a security incident, stating that the attack was not carried out by internal personnel and that no team members were involved. The claim about the team secretly selling tokens is incorrect. The team has also not had any contact with Web3Port.The investigation confirmed that the attack was not due to address poisoning, but rather a leak of the signer's private key. The attacker independently held the private key and submitted a transaction with a forged address 43 minutes after the correct transaction. The forged address shares the first and last four characters with the correct address (starting with 0x70AE and ending with 5C15) to disguise itself in the Safe interface preview. The stolen funds are fully traceable and are currently stored in three cold wallets on Ethereum, containing approximately 2784 ETH, along with about 170,000 USDT that were cross-chain transferred out.The attacker also created a large number of counterfeit addresses and sent false transfer events to these addresses using Unicode-forged token symbols in an attempt to confuse tracking. This counterfeit address construction technique is the same as the method used when attacking this project. The attacker had pre-built a large-scale infrastructure, indicating that this was an industrialized operation rather than an opportunistic attack.