Scan to download
BTC $60,861.48 -1.60%
ETH $1,568.45 -4.71%
BNB $577.71 -0.13%
XRP $1.09 -1.49%
SOL $62.75 -3.26%
TRX $0.3210 -0.95%
DOGE $0.0809 -2.70%
ADA $0.1569 -2.45%
BCH $222.80 +0.46%
LINK $7.36 -1.41%
HYPE $59.97 -0.02%
AAVE $61.37 -9.01%
SUI $0.7027 +1.86%
XLM $0.1965 +4.18%
ZEC $385.49 +26.23%
BTC $60,861.48 -1.60%
ETH $1,568.45 -4.71%
BNB $577.71 -0.13%
XRP $1.09 -1.49%
SOL $62.75 -3.26%
TRX $0.3210 -0.95%
DOGE $0.0809 -2.70%
ADA $0.1569 -2.45%
BCH $222.80 +0.46%
LINK $7.36 -1.41%
HYPE $59.97 -0.02%
AAVE $61.37 -9.01%
SUI $0.7027 +1.86%
XLM $0.1965 +4.18%
ZEC $385.49 +26.23%

virtual

The second trial of the 660,000 yuan virtual currency theft case in Wuhan, China, has been revised: the main culprit was sentenced to ten years and six months in prison, and the amount stolen was determined based on the actual payment cost incurred by the victim

According to the "Procuratorial Daily," Lin, Zeng, and Dai conspired to use virtual currency trading as a pretext. During the trading process, they secretly filmed the victim's digital wallet private key and, after the virtual currency was credited, secretly logged into the victim's wallet to reverse the transaction, transferring the related virtual currency back to their controlled accounts. The three committed the crime three times, causing the victim a total economic loss of 660,000 yuan.The first-instance court held that in the absence of a clear judicial interpretation regarding the valuation method of virtual currency and sentencing standards, it was inappropriate to directly determine the amount involved as particularly huge based on the victim's purchase amount of 660,000 yuan. Therefore, they sentenced the three based on "other serious circumstances," imposing prison terms ranging from eight years to five years and six months, along with fines. The Hanyang District Procuratorate of Wuhan City in Hubei Province subsequently filed an appeal, which was supported by the Wuhan City Procuratorate.The prosecution argued that the first-instance court applied the law incorrectly and imposed an excessively light sentence. Prosecutor Dai Wentao of the Wuhan City Procuratorate stated that in the case where the victim had a clear loss amount to refer to, it was contradictory and legally erroneous to claim that the value of virtual currency could not be determined. In judicial practice, using the resale price and transaction price as the basis for determining the amount of theft has become mainstream, and determining the value of virtual currency based on the actual cost paid by the victim has factual, legal, and practical basis.The Intermediate Court of Wuhan accepted the prosecution's opinion in the second instance, revoked the corresponding content of the original judgment, and changed the determination of the theft amount to particularly huge. It sentenced the principal offender Lin to ten years and six months in prison for theft, and sentenced the accomplices Zeng and Dai to eight years in prison each, along with fines.

The Qingdao procuratorate clarifies the property nature of virtual currency in a case involving the theft of 107 bitcoins

According to Shandong Legal News, a Bitcoin theft case prosecuted by the Li Cang District Prosecutor's Office in Qingdao has been sentenced. The defendant, Zhang, was sentenced to 10 years and 9 months in prison for theft and fined 100,000 yuan.In the early hours of a certain day in 2024, the virtual currency wallet of the victim, Feng, was quietly accessed, and 107 Bitcoins were transferred, equivalent to over 22.54 million yuan at the market price on that day. It was found that Feng had entrusted an acquaintance, Zhang, to assist with the operation. During the process of registering the wallet on behalf of Feng, Zhang obtained the mnemonic phrase, and after multiple attempts in the early morning, he cracked the wallet and transferred the Bitcoins. After being apprehended, Zhang claimed that his actions were a "protective takeover" to prevent the Bitcoins from being stolen by others. The prosecution traced the funds and found that the stolen Bitcoins were transferred multiple times and exchanged for over 660,000 yuan, exposing his lies.The prosecution determined that Bitcoin has economic value and exclusive control, meeting the core characteristics of "property" in criminal law, and can be the object of theft. The actual proceeds from the sale of the stolen Bitcoins, amounting to over 660,000 yuan, were used as the basis for the theft amount. After the defendant appealed, in November 2025, the Qingdao Intermediate People's Court ruled to dismiss the appeal and upheld the original sentence. This case is a typical example of Qingdao's legal punishment of crimes in the virtual currency field, clearly conveying the judicial stance: activities related to virtual currency must be conducted within the legal framework, and stealing others' virtual property also constitutes a crime.

The Supreme Court: Will formulate judicial interpretations on civil compensation related to insider trading and market manipulation, and study adjudication rules for new types of cases such as virtual currencies

According to CCTV News, the State Council Information Office held a series of themed press conferences on "Starting the 14th Five-Year Plan," introducing the situation regarding "Promoting Comprehensive Rule of Law." At the press conference, Liu Guixiang, a deputy-level full-time member of the Supreme People's Court Judicial Committee and a second-level chief judge, stated that in-depth research on new case adjudication rules for virtual currencies, cross-border finance, and other new types of cases should be conducted. Judicial interpretations regarding civil compensation related to insider trading and market manipulation should be formulated as soon as possible to ensure the stable operation of the capital market and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of small and medium-sized investors.In response to the new business formats of the digital economy, normative documents regarding judicial protection of artificial intelligence cases and data ownership should be researched and developed. The adjudication rules concerning data ownership, data transactions, AI generation, and other aspects should be improved to promote the deep integration of digital technology with the real economy, assist in perfecting the foundational institutional system for data elements, and promote the construction of an integrated data market that is open, shared, and secure.

Ningbo Customs Anti-Smuggling Bureau has cracked a series of smuggling cases involving virtual currency mining machines, seizing over 400 "mining machines."

According to Zhejiang Daily, recently, the Ningbo Customs Anti-Smuggling Bureau successfully dismantled multiple criminal gangs smuggling virtual currency "mining machines" through in-depth operations and meticulous investigations, effectively cutting off an illegal industrial chain.Previously, during a routine inspection of a batch of imported express shipments declared as "industrial blockers," Ningbo Customs discovered that the actual goods did not match the declaration and were, in fact, virtual currency "mining machines." Customs officers quickly transferred this lead to the anti-smuggling department. After receiving the report, the Ningbo Customs Anti-Smuggling Bureau immediately assembled a task force by drawing on elite personnel, and through data analysis and clue investigation, gradually clarified the organizational structure and operational model of the criminal network. When the timing was right, they decisively struck, simultaneously conducting net-seizing operations in Dongguan, Shenzhen, and other locations, successfully dismantling multiple smuggling gangs of mining machines.Upon investigation, it was confirmed that this series of cases seized over 400 illegal entry mining machines of brands such as Ant L9 and Ice River KS3. The investigation revealed that the smuggling gang led by Liao, in order to make illegal profits, procured "mining machines" from overseas suppliers, disassembled the whole machines, and misreported the product names to smuggle them into the country through international express channels from ports in Ningbo, Guangzhou, and other places. After the goods entered the country, the gang reassembled them, either selling them directly domestically or transporting them to hidden "mining sites" in Xinjiang, Hunan, and other places to engage in illegal virtual currency "mining" activities. At the same time, they utilized virtual currencies like USDT for cross-border payment settlements to evade financial supervision.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.