BTC $84,853.32 +1.01%
ETH $2,684.60 +0.97%
BNB $790.85 +3.48%
XRP $1.49 +1.55%
SOL $119.80 +1.85%
TRX $0.3358 +0.29%
DOGE $0.0931 +2.49%
ADA $0.2451 +2.90%
BCH $314.55 +4.50%
LINK $13.93 +2.80%
HYPE $88.92 +3.06%
AAVE $178.97 -0.03%
SUI $1.17 +5.02%
XLM $0.2155 +1.76%
ZEC $1,309.09 +1.04%
AAPL $333.48 +0.01%
AMZN $251.72 +0.52%
GOOGL $343.20 +0.08%
MSFT $517.66 +0.53%
META $729.05 +0.21%
NVDA $234.60 +0.27%
TSLA $370.76 -0.37%
SNDK $1,715.91 -0.35%
INTC $118.05 -1.40%
SPCX $159.08 -0.06%
MU $1,071.08 -0.36%
AMD $633.41 0.00%
BTC $84,853.32 +1.01%
ETH $2,684.60 +0.97%
BNB $790.85 +3.48%
XRP $1.49 +1.55%
SOL $119.80 +1.85%
TRX $0.3358 +0.29%
DOGE $0.0931 +2.49%
ADA $0.2451 +2.90%
BCH $314.55 +4.50%
LINK $13.93 +2.80%
HYPE $88.92 +3.06%
AAVE $178.97 -0.03%
SUI $1.17 +5.02%
XLM $0.2155 +1.76%
ZEC $1,309.09 +1.04%
AAPL $333.48 +0.01%
AMZN $251.72 +0.52%
GOOGL $343.20 +0.08%
MSFT $517.66 +0.53%
META $729.05 +0.21%
NVDA $234.60 +0.27%
TSLA $370.76 -0.37%
SNDK $1,715.91 -0.35%
INTC $118.05 -1.40%
SPCX $159.08 -0.06%
MU $1,071.08 -0.36%
AMD $633.41 0.00%

湖南长沙某男子花 165 万租服务器“挖矿”被骗

2024-08-17 15:14:31

ChainCatcher 消息,据澎湃新闻报道,湖南省长沙市中级法院发布一起涉及虚拟货币“挖矿”的环境资源审判典型案例。

原告罗某与被告湖南某公司签订了三份合同,合同约定被告公司为罗某提供服务器 5 台,总价 165 万元;被告公司承诺“挖矿”收益不低于全网平均水平,如因技术问题造成罚币,由公司承担相应损失。合同签订后,罗某按合同要求将 165 万元分期打给被告湖南某公司的实际所有者范某。后范某及其公司一直未向罗某交付服务器设备及软件系统,也未获得范某及其公司承诺的任何投资收益。罗某起诉至法院要求解除合同,并赔偿损失。

长沙市天心区法院认定,原被告双方签订的合同因违背公序良俗而无效,被告公司因向案外人公司租用机柜花费 6 万元,考虑到双方对案涉合同的无效均有过错,故而该损失应由双方各承担 3 万元。被告湖南某公司已收取原告 165 万元,应当向原告返还 162 万元;被告范某对其名下湖南某公司承担的给付义务承担连带偿还责任;驳回罗某的其他诉讼请求。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界