BTC $63,002.66 -0.22%
ETH $1,881.40 -0.17%
BNB $610.49 +0.64%
XRP $1.00 -0.15%
SOL $75.52 -0.03%
TRX $0.3316 -0.20%
DOGE $0.0698 -0.13%
ADA $0.1772 -1.74%
BCH $205.47 +0.83%
LINK $9.60 +7.47%
HYPE $56.93 +1.78%
AAVE $86.71 +0.00%
SUI $0.6813 +0.45%
XLM $0.1591 -0.59%
ZEC $488.04 -0.77%
BTC $63,002.66 -0.22%
ETH $1,881.40 -0.17%
BNB $610.49 +0.64%
XRP $1.00 -0.15%
SOL $75.52 -0.03%
TRX $0.3316 -0.20%
DOGE $0.0698 -0.13%
ADA $0.1772 -1.74%
BCH $205.47 +0.83%
LINK $9.60 +7.47%
HYPE $56.93 +1.78%
AAVE $86.71 +0.00%
SUI $0.6813 +0.45%
XLM $0.1591 -0.59%
ZEC $488.04 -0.77%

balance

All
Article
Flash

Gray Research Director: Ethereum is like a "small country," and the issuance of ETH determines the balance between network security and currency

Zach Pandl, the head of research at Grayscale, posted on the X platform comparing Ethereum to a "small country" and discussed the ETH issuance mechanism. He believes that Ethereum has only one core "government function": to protect property rights and value exchange within the system. Unlike traditional countries that provide public services through taxation, Ethereum primarily funds network security through "seigniorage," which is the issuance of new ETH.In this framework, the stakers responsible for maintaining network security are akin to a group providing public services, as they receive rewards through newly issued ETH. Therefore, Ethereum's staking mechanism and ETH issuance policy essentially constitute the network's fiscal and monetary policy. Zach Pandl pointed out that the Ethereum community needs to decide how much "new currency" should be used to cover network security costs. More security typically means stronger protection of property rights, but at the cost of a higher ETH issuance rate and potential other risks.For example, if network security increasingly relies on a few large staking service providers, there remains room for discussion about whether these providers can maintain the asset rights of all users completely neutrally. Pandl believes that, just as in traditional economies, no one knows the "optimal level" of government spending and currency issuance; the same applies to Ethereum. However, Ethereum has several key security thresholds, including: 1/3: an attacker reaching this ratio may affect finality; 1/2: affects blockchain fork choice; 2/3: can control the finality process. Some community members believe that the design of Ethereum's monetary and fiscal policy should consider the security trade-offs brought by these key ratios, while the current mechanism has not adequately incorporated these factors. However, the above analogy is not entirely accurate, as it does not yet involve other important factors such as the ETH burn mechanism, MEV, governance, etc.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.