Scan to download
BTC $67,031.70 -0.23%
ETH $2,061.17 +0.50%
BNB $610.90 -0.42%
XRP $1.32 -1.05%
SOL $81.41 -2.85%
TRX $0.3127 -1.23%
DOGE $0.0908 -1.79%
ADA $0.2421 -2.13%
BCH $471.71 +3.39%
LINK $8.69 -1.16%
HYPE $36.29 -4.03%
AAVE $97.50 -0.85%
SUI $0.8700 -0.79%
XLM $0.1651 -2.94%
ZEC $247.67 +10.78%
BTC $67,031.70 -0.23%
ETH $2,061.17 +0.50%
BNB $610.90 -0.42%
XRP $1.32 -1.05%
SOL $81.41 -2.85%
TRX $0.3127 -1.23%
DOGE $0.0908 -1.79%
ADA $0.2421 -2.13%
BCH $471.71 +3.39%
LINK $8.69 -1.16%
HYPE $36.29 -4.03%
AAVE $97.50 -0.85%
SUI $0.8700 -0.79%
XLM $0.1651 -2.94%
ZEC $247.67 +10.78%

for

A new American cryptocurrency political action committee, BLF, has been established to support candidates who advocate for blockchain-friendly policies

As the 2026 midterm elections in the United States approach, a new cryptocurrency political action committee (PAC) — Blockchain Leadership Fund (BLF) was officially launched on March 30, 2026. The fund was initiated by members of The Digital Chamber to support candidates promoting digital asset and blockchain-friendly policies across federal, state, and local elections.As a hybrid PAC, it can both make direct contributions to candidates and fund independent political advocacy efforts. Early supporters include Anchorage Digital and Chainlink Labs. The cryptocurrency industry is intensifying its efforts to influence the legislative process for digital assets in the U.S., especially during this critical period of discussions around regulatory frameworks like the Digital Asset Market Clear Act.Meanwhile, the well-known crypto super PAC Fairshake (supported by Coinbase, Ripple, and Andreessen Horowitz) faced setbacks in the Illinois primary in March 2026. Despite the PAC's strong performance since 2023, having raised $260 million during the 2023-2024 election cycle, supporting 33 winners in 35 primaries, and continuously accumulating $193 million by the end of 2025.However, its recent investment of nearly $20 million in the Illinois primary yielded poor results, with over $10 million spent opposing Democratic Senate candidate Juliana Stratton and nearly $2.5 million opposing Congressman La Shawn Ford, ultimately resulting in failure for both.

Illustration of Robinhood's 12 Web3 business partners: Compliance capabilities are transforming into competitive barriers

The Web3 asset data platform RootData has outlined Robinhood's Web3 partners, whose crypto supply chain covers key aspects such as data services, risk control compliance, and trading liquidity. Compliance capabilities are shifting from a "cost item" to a "competitive barrier."Structurally, Robinhood's crypto layout emphasizes compliance first and robust expansion: on one hand, it holds multiple financial and crypto-related licenses in the U.S. and several other regions, giving it a first-mover advantage in advancing its business within the regulatory framework; on the other hand, its partner selection clearly favors suppliers with strong compliance capabilities and mature institutional-level services.In the risk control and compliance aspects, Robinhood has introduced service providers like TRM Labs and Sardine to enhance on-chain transaction monitoring and anti-fraud capabilities; at the infrastructure level, it ensures system stability and data reliability through established networks and service providers such as Arbitrum, Polygon, Alchemy, and Chainlink; in terms of trading and liquidity, it supports platforms like Bitstamp and WonderFi that have compliance operating experience. Related compilation: 【Robinhood Crypto Partner Network Compilation (Continuously Updated)】Crypto projects actively showcasing their partner networks have become a key way to enhance transparency and market trust. It is reported that RootData welcomes Web3 project parties to claim data and continues to track and open more project business relationship disclosure channels. The platform has continuously released multiple editions of the crypto project ecosystem map, nominating Web3 ecosystem partners for upstream clients such as Visa, Stripe, and Coinbase.If you wish to nominate your project in future ecosystem maps, please fill out the 【RootData 2026 Industry Ecosystem Mapping】 form to supplement your important clients and partners.

Slow Fog: Pay attention to checking for malicious versions of axios and the exposure risk of global installation history for OpenClaw npm

Slow Fog has once again issued a security reminder stating to pay attention to checking for malicious versions of axios and the exposure risk of OpenClaw npm global installation history. [email protected] and [email protected] have been confirmed as malicious versions, both of which have injected the dependency [email protected], delivering cross-platform malicious payloads through the postinstall script.The impact of OpenClaw is assessed based on scenarios: source code builds are not affected, as the locked versions in the lock file are 1.13.5/1.13.6; however, users who installed via npm install -g [email protected] face historical exposure risks due to the presence of optionalDependencies.axios@^1.7.4 in the dependency chain, which may resolve to [email protected] during the time window when the malicious version is still online. Currently, npm has reverted the resolution to [email protected], but environments that were installed during the attack window are still advised to be checked. Slow Fog has provided inspection commands and IoC paths for various platforms; if the plain-crypto-js directory is found, even if the package.json has been cleaned, it should still be regarded as high-risk execution traces. It is recommended that affected hosts immediately rotate credentials and conduct host-side inspections. Previously, Slow Fog founder Yu Xian reminded that OpenClaw version 3.28 may introduce a toxic version of axios, and users need to urgently check.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.