BTC $84,794.90 +0.31%
ETH $2,690.64 +0.72%
BNB $786.19 +2.31%
XRP $1.49 +0.10%
SOL $120.00 +0.92%
TRX $0.3356 +0.34%
DOGE $0.0929 -0.28%
ADA $0.2444 -0.83%
BCH $319.82 +2.18%
LINK $14.15 +2.01%
HYPE $89.57 -0.26%
AAVE $182.20 +1.98%
SUI $1.17 +0.65%
XLM $0.2161 +0.23%
ZEC $1,316.62 -0.91%
AAPL $333.32 +0.00%
AMZN $252.33 +0.35%
GOOGL $343.73 +0.17%
MSFT $517.91 +0.15%
META $730.57 +0.44%
NVDA $234.96 +0.23%
TSLA $371.25 +0.03%
SNDK $1,717.88 -0.23%
INTC $117.59 -1.56%
SPCX $159.06 -0.02%
MU $1,068.49 -0.13%
AMD $633.32 -0.09%
BTC $84,794.90 +0.31%
ETH $2,690.64 +0.72%
BNB $786.19 +2.31%
XRP $1.49 +0.10%
SOL $120.00 +0.92%
TRX $0.3356 +0.34%
DOGE $0.0929 -0.28%
ADA $0.2444 -0.83%
BCH $319.82 +2.18%
LINK $14.15 +2.01%
HYPE $89.57 -0.26%
AAVE $182.20 +1.98%
SUI $1.17 +0.65%
XLM $0.2161 +0.23%
ZEC $1,316.62 -0.91%
AAPL $333.32 +0.00%
AMZN $252.33 +0.35%
GOOGL $343.73 +0.17%
MSFT $517.91 +0.15%
META $730.57 +0.44%
NVDA $234.96 +0.23%
TSLA $371.25 +0.03%
SNDK $1,717.88 -0.23%
INTC $117.59 -1.56%
SPCX $159.06 -0.02%
MU $1,068.49 -0.13%
AMD $633.32 -0.09%

Slow Fog: If Bybit upgrades the Safe contract to version 1.3.0 or higher and implements an appropriate Guard mechanism, it may avoid the theft of 1.5 billion dollars in assets

2025-02-26 16:49:20

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist stated that on February 21, 2025, Bybit's on-chain multi-signature wallet was targeted and breached, with nearly $1.5 billion in assets quietly lost through a transaction with a "legitimate signature." Subsequent on-chain analysis revealed that the attacker gained multi-signature permissions through sophisticated social engineering attacks, implanted malicious logic using the delegatecall function of the Safe contract, and ultimately bypassed the multi-signature verification mechanism to transfer funds to an anonymous address. "Multi-signature" does not equal "absolute security"; even a secure mechanism like the Safe multi-signature wallet can still be at risk of being compromised if lacking additional protective measures.

Bybit is using version v1.1.1 (<1.3.0) of the Safe contract, which means they cannot utilize the Guard mechanism, a key security feature. If Bybit had upgraded to version 1.3.0 or higher of the Safe contract and implemented an appropriate Guard mechanism, such as specifying a whitelist address for receiving funds and conducting strict contract function ACL verification, they might have been able to avoid this loss. Although this is merely a hypothesis, it provides important insights for future asset security management.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.