BTC $84,754.80 +0.26%
ETH $2,688.21 +1.00%
BNB $786.67 +2.69%
XRP $1.49 +0.99%
SOL $119.82 +1.48%
TRX $0.3353 +0.36%
DOGE $0.0930 +1.11%
ADA $0.2447 +1.74%
BCH $316.47 +2.90%
LINK $14.17 +3.65%
HYPE $89.66 +3.75%
AAVE $180.83 +0.13%
SUI $1.17 +5.18%
XLM $0.2156 +1.23%
ZEC $1,310.26 +2.30%
AAPL $333.32 -0.01%
AMZN $252.01 +0.37%
GOOGL $343.26 +0.01%
MSFT $517.87 +0.07%
META $729.98 +0.37%
NVDA $235.02 +0.46%
TSLA $370.91 -0.06%
SNDK $1,718.99 +0.03%
INTC $117.94 -1.08%
SPCX $158.99 +0.15%
MU $1,070.32 -0.13%
AMD $634.10 +0.17%
BTC $84,754.80 +0.26%
ETH $2,688.21 +1.00%
BNB $786.67 +2.69%
XRP $1.49 +0.99%
SOL $119.82 +1.48%
TRX $0.3353 +0.36%
DOGE $0.0930 +1.11%
ADA $0.2447 +1.74%
BCH $316.47 +2.90%
LINK $14.17 +3.65%
HYPE $89.66 +3.75%
AAVE $180.83 +0.13%
SUI $1.17 +5.18%
XLM $0.2156 +1.23%
ZEC $1,310.26 +2.30%
AAPL $333.32 -0.01%
AMZN $252.01 +0.37%
GOOGL $343.26 +0.01%
MSFT $517.87 +0.07%
META $729.98 +0.37%
NVDA $235.02 +0.46%
TSLA $370.91 -0.06%
SNDK $1,718.99 +0.03%
INTC $117.94 -1.08%
SPCX $158.99 +0.15%
MU $1,070.32 -0.13%
AMD $634.10 +0.17%

湖南長沙某男子花 165 萬租伺服器“挖礦”被騙

2024-08-17 15:14:31

ChainCatcher 消息,据澎湃新聞報導,湖南省長沙市中級法院發布一起涉及虛擬貨幣"挖礦"的環境資源審判典型案例。

原告羅某與被告湖南某公司簽訂了三份合同,合同約定被告公司為羅某提供伺服器 5 台,總價 165 萬元;被告公司承諾"挖礦"收益不低於全網平均水平,如因技術問題造成罰幣,由公司承擔相應損失。合同簽訂後,羅某按合同要求將 165 萬元分期打給被告湖南某公司的實際所有者范某。後范某及其公司一直未向羅某交付伺服器設備及軟體系統,也未獲得范某及其公司承諾的任何投資收益。羅某起訴至法院要求解除合同,並賠償損失。

長沙市天心區法院認定,原被告雙方簽訂的合同因違背公序良俗而無效,被告公司因向案外人公司租用機櫃花費 6 萬元,考慮到雙方對案涉合同的無效均有過錯,故而該損失應由雙方各承擔 3 萬元。被告湖南某公司已收取原告 165 萬元,應當向原告返還 162 萬元;被告范某對其名下湖南某公司承擔的給付義務承擔連帶償還責任;駁回羅某的其他訴訟請求。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 與創新者共建Web3世界