BTC $84,623.57 -1.53%
ETH $2,677.99 -1.86%
BNB $766.08 -1.45%
XRP $1.49 -2.42%
SOL $119.56 -1.85%
TRX $0.3351 +0.32%
DOGE $0.0929 -3.15%
ADA $0.2459 -3.47%
BCH $310.37 -1.31%
LINK $14.10 -2.38%
HYPE $88.27 -2.05%
AAVE $179.00 -3.50%
SUI $1.14 -3.00%
XLM $0.2149 -3.50%
ZEC $1,315.35 -4.86%
AAPL $333.34 +0.72%
AMZN $251.79 +0.95%
GOOGL $343.69 +1.14%
MSFT $517.70 +0.36%
META $727.65 -0.00%
NVDA $234.19 +1.08%
TSLA $370.86 +4.26%
SNDK $1,718.66 -3.71%
INTC $118.10 -2.05%
SPCX $158.96 +6.60%
MU $1,067.77 -2.27%
AMD $632.69 +2.29%
BTC $84,623.57 -1.53%
ETH $2,677.99 -1.86%
BNB $766.08 -1.45%
XRP $1.49 -2.42%
SOL $119.56 -1.85%
TRX $0.3351 +0.32%
DOGE $0.0929 -3.15%
ADA $0.2459 -3.47%
BCH $310.37 -1.31%
LINK $14.10 -2.38%
HYPE $88.27 -2.05%
AAVE $179.00 -3.50%
SUI $1.14 -3.00%
XLM $0.2149 -3.50%
ZEC $1,315.35 -4.86%
AAPL $333.34 +0.72%
AMZN $251.79 +0.95%
GOOGL $343.69 +1.14%
MSFT $517.70 +0.36%
META $727.65 -0.00%
NVDA $234.19 +1.08%
TSLA $370.86 +4.26%
SNDK $1,718.66 -3.71%
INTC $118.10 -2.05%
SPCX $158.96 +6.60%
MU $1,067.77 -2.27%
AMD $632.69 +2.29%

帮人炒“泰达币”亏了十几万?台州市黄岩区人民法院:合同无效,全数返还

2021-11-20 14:39:17

链捕手消息,近日台州市黄岩法院审结一起委托合同纠纷案件,黄甲经人介绍与张乙签订了《数字货币量化委托协议书》一份,约定黄甲以个人名义转账给张乙20万元用于购买泰达币(USDT),由张乙投资运作,协议到期后保底归还黄甲合同签订时购买的等量数字货币;张乙定期向黄甲结算相应收益,合同到期时结算所委托的数字货币;协议期限为一年。然而,市场行情并未像黄甲预期的那般良好,张乙亦无法控制虚拟货币市场的行情变化,陆陆续续返还给黄甲投资款95760元,剩下的款项迟迟未能返还给,眼见投资回本无望的黄甲将张乙起诉到了法院,要求其返还投资款,并赔偿相应的利息损失。
 
台州市黄岩区人民法院裁定,本案案涉标的物本身不具有合法性,故原、被告关于该交易物的委托托管行为亦不受法律保护,因此原、被告签订的《数字货币量化委托协议书》属于无效合同。被告依无效合同取得的财产应当返还给原告,被告应返还原告剩余的104240元投资款。原告应当明知虚拟货币的投资不受国家法律所保护,而仍然委托被告进行投资,本身存在过错,故其请求赔偿利息等损失的主张于法无据,不予支持。

app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界