Unveiling the KOL Cycle: A Wealth Experiment Driven by Traffic

Author: Viee, Core Contributor of Biteye

Editor: Denise, Core Contributor of Biteye

Once upon a time, the playbook of the primary market was relatively clear: VCs provided funding, KOLs made their voices heard, and retail investors provided liquidity.

But today, this playbook seems to be breaking down.

VC endorsements are no longer omnipotent; project teams are starting to redesign the rules of the game around "influence." KOLs are no longer just simple traffic roles. They hold the chips, sit at the table, and can even determine the life and death of a project.

To some extent, the KOL round is a token distribution method that emerged after VCs exited and retail investors fell silent, under the narrative of "influence supremacy." In the past 7 days, XHunt statistics show that there were as many as 3,860 tweets mentioning "KOL" in the crypto circle, while "VC" had 3,078 tweets, marking the quiet beginning of a shadow war over influence.

This article does not discuss grand theories but tells the real story behind the KOL round—where it came from, who is laughing, who is crying, who is counting money behind the scenes, and who is losing sleep at night.

01 How did the KOL round step into the spotlight?

Let's rewind to the end of 2022.

The winter of crypto VCs has arrived. Primary market valuations are inflated, exit cycles are lengthening, and the secondary market cannot absorb the supply. Large institutions are hesitant to act, and small projects struggle to raise funds.

On the other hand, retail investors have quietly returned. Blast, ZKsync, Friend.tech… every liquidity explosion signals the return of retail investors.

What influences these people the most is not institutional research reports but those KOLs who seem to "know the business" while actually "selling goods."

Project teams have also realized: VCs may not be able to help me break out, but KOLs can. Rather than spending money on advertising, it’s better to give low-priced chips to KOLs, let them tweet, and create momentum.

Thus, a new play emerged:

• Project teams provide KOLs with quotas, sometimes at prices even lower than VCs;

• KOLs shout loudly before TGE, creating FOMO;

• At the moment of unlocking, traffic explodes, and KOLs cash out and exit.

The KOL round has arrived. You can think of it as a "private placement with tasks." Low prices, quick unlocks, and even "minimum guarantee clauses."

Project teams calculate clearly: give tokens to those with fans and influence, and after going live, they will naturally bring people to drive up the price.

KOLs also feel they are not losing: acquiring tokens at a low price, bringing some traffic, and selling part upon unlocking sounds like a guaranteed profit.

But is reality really like this?

02 The Truth of the KOL Round: Some Get Rich, Some Go to Zero

2.1 The Profit and Loss of the KOL Round

The performance of profit and loss in the KOL round varies greatly depending on the project and market environment.

In a bull market, the KOL round is often seen as a "triple win": projects get funding, KOLs lay out at low prices in advance, and retail investors can earn a bit by following along. But in a bear market, the script changes completely.

As liquidity decreases, it becomes normal for prices to drop immediately after going live. KOLs, unable to sell in time due to lock-up, can suffer heavy losses. KOL @realChainDoctor admitted that he invested in more than ten KOL rounds last year, none of which were profitable, and some didn’t even receive tokens. In the view of @kiki520_eth, KOL rounds have certain systemic traps, where tokens may not be received, or rules may even change after a price increase.

Top KOL @jason_chen998 stated that his most profitable investments were Aster and Mira, where he obtained lower valuations when the market was quiet and the project teams were reliable, coinciding with a bull market during TGE. Therefore, the key to making money in KOL rounds is still to ambush in a bear market and rely on connections to get projects. However, he also admitted that most KOL rounds are just high-yield financial products; with good luck, there might be some returns, but with bad luck, one ends up spending money working, facing pressure from project teams for content, token deductions, and unlock delays, ultimately leading to an unhappy ending.

We reviewed some recent KOL round cases, and some projects indeed brought high returns, such as:

• Aster: When the token price broke $1.79, the KOL round had a maximum floating profit of over 70 times. If only considering the 30% unlocked at launch, it would yield 21 times, equivalent to a profit of 1.05 million U from an initial investment of 50,000 U.

  

• Holoworld AI: Lookonchain detected that the on-chain address 0x3723, suspected to be a KOL investor, received about 10.24 million HOLO in September at a cost of only $0.088. Subsequently, they gradually cashed out at an average price of around $0.6, totaling over 4.71 million U, with a single round return rate exceeding 444%, netting over 4 million U.

• WalletConnect: After unlocking, ICO and KOL round investors only received about 1.5 times returns.

However, there have also been many KOL round projects that collapsed in price after launch or encountered issues with the project teams.

A typical case is SatoshiVM at the beginning of 2024, where the project token $SAVM, leveraging a large number of KOLs for hype, once surged over $11, but soon news of KOLs cashing out at high prices emerged, leading to a crisis of trust, and the project gradually cooled down. Those KOLs and retail investors who did not sell are likely to find it hard to profit; currently, $SAVM has dropped to about $0.075.

Another example is ZKasino, where KOLs participated in financing and promotion, but the project team unilaterally changed the rules after users completed the lock-up, absconding with the assets. In this incident, KOLs who participated in financing and promotion were condemned by fans as accomplices, suffering not only financial losses but also immense public pressure.

A few months ago, Eclipse launched its token with a KOL round valuation of up to $600 million and a Series A valuation of $1 billion, but the actual circulating market value after launch was only about $380 million, far below the rumored $600 million valuation. Research KOL @_FORAB stated that some KOL round quotas were also distributed to media and communities, and in the end, the token didn't even get listed on Binance contracts.

In response, well-known KOL @yuyue_chris pointed out in a tweet that the real problem with KOL rounds is not losing money, but that project teams and intermediaries use KOL rounds under the guise of promotion to pull people in, making KOLs use their fans to redeem their principal. This kind of scheme to exploit acquaintances is the most irresponsible.

2.2 Behind the Profits: The Triangular Game of Projects, KOLs, and Retail Investors

As mentioned earlier, the KOL round reflects the changing power structure of the entire primary market.

In the past, project teams relied on VCs for funding, and VCs filtered projects based on their influence. Now, project teams have discovered that KOLs are cheaper, faster, and more capable of generating hype.

VCs are unhappy: after investing millions of dollars, they find project teams letting in a bunch of low-priced tweeters whose influence may even surpass their own… so some VCs choose to "exit."

Retail investors are even more displeased: they buy tokens that KOLs dump after unlocking in the secondary market, only to see KOLs shouting about the tokens on launch day, which actually means they are offloading.

Project teams may not be happy either: because KOLs' hype is often short-term, the volume, liquidity, and high opening on launch day do not represent the project's long-term trajectory.

Thus, a tense triangular relationship forms on the KOL round stage.

• KOLs are calculating: how can they safely exit with their invested money and reputation?

• Project teams are wondering: can the quotas given translate into the expected volume and price increase?

• Retail investors are asking: is this follow-up an opportunity or a trap?

The interests of these three parties are like forces pulling in different directions. Unless the project itself is strong enough to magnetically attract all three forces, any party's excessive force could cause this triangle to collapse completely.

03 The "Intermediary" You Can't Ignore—Agency

In KOL rounds, project teams often do not directly connect with KOLs but instead distribute and manage through third-party agencies.

They are the "resource allocators" in this game. They help project teams design KOL round terms (prices, quotas, unlocks); select and invite suitable KOLs; supervise progress and ensure content delivery. Some reliable agencies also design mechanisms for minimum returns, promotional rewards, or principal refunds to help KOLs reduce risks.

They are the "intermediaries" in the entire KOL round system, controlling traffic and resources. So if you are a newly emerging KOL wanting to participate in KOL rounds, the first thing to do is not to find projects but to find the right agency.

You may have heard of the following agencies:

• LFG Labs (@dubailfg): Founded by @snow949494 (XHunt Chinese ranking 134), focusing on China, Japan, Korea, and the Middle East, mainly connecting top projects and excelling in integrating KOL resources, content dissemination, and KOL round financing linkage.

• JE Labs (@JELabs2024): Founded by @0xEvieYang (XHunt Chinese ranking 244) in 2024, mainly building brands and communities for early high-potential projects, connecting with Chinese audiences, helping projects grow from 0 to N.

• BlockFocus (@BlockFocus11): Founded by "Ergou" @CryptoErgou (XHunt Chinese ranking 469), one of the earliest agencies in the Chinese region, emphasizing project value accumulation and medium to long-term operations.

• Shard (@ShardDXB): Founded by @ciaobelindazhou (XHunt Chinese ranking 784), a marketing agency incubated by a crypto investment fund, focusing on providing strategic narratives and global growth services for Web3 infrastructure projects, covering key markets in multiple languages including Chinese, English, Korean, Japanese, and Russian.

• XDO: Led by seasoned first-tier investor @mscryptojiayi (XHunt Chinese ranking 213), who prefers to work on "few but refined" projects, handling everything from mechanism design, strategic consulting, to market narrative shaping and execution.

• Mango Labs (@MangoLabs): Founded by @dovwo (XHunt Chinese ranking 112), focusing on marketing and KOL placement in Chinese regions, providing a full range of services from narrative creation to community operation.

• Cipher Dance (@Cipher_Dance): Founded by @Jeffmindfulness (XHunt Chinese ranking 2178), focusing on content marketing in the Pre-TGE stage, skilled in amplifying project narratives through creative forms and multilingual KOL placements.

• 4XLabs: "Strategic consulting + KOL matrix," helping global projects achieve growth from 0 to 1 in the Chinese market. Team members include @jasonchen998 (XHunt Chinese ranking 34); @Bitwux (XHunt Chinese ranking 24); @PhyrexNi (XHunt Chinese ranking 8); @KuiGas (XHunt Chinese ranking 31).

04 How to Get the Attention of Project Teams/Agencies?

Typically, project teams or agencies allocate quotas based on KOL influence metrics (such as follower count, past tweet popularity, etc.) and clarify content production and unlocking requirements.

To gain KOL round opportunities, the core is to enhance "content + data" and establish a trustworthy personal brand:

• Continuously produce professional content: Keep publishing market analysis, on-chain data insights, or project evaluations.

• Actively engage on Twitter: Interact with project teams and other KOLs, participate in AMAs, live streams, and tweet discussions to increase activity in the industry.

• Use tools to optimize data: Utilize analytical tools to enhance account visibility, such as using @xhunt_ai to check your account's influence ranking, capability model, attention metrics, etc., and adjust content production accordingly. XHunt has also launched scoring systems like the "Soul Index," which has become an important reference for many project teams and agencies in evaluating KOLs.

• Establish connections through multiple channels: In addition to online promotion, you can also attend offline industry events or hackathons to meet project teams.

05 How Do KOLs Screen Projects?

KOL rounds are not charity; every participant has pressure to recoup their investment. Choosing the wrong project not only leads to losses but also damages reputation and affects the interests of ordinary users. Therefore, it’s best to conduct systematic screening before collaboration, similar to investing in private placements, focusing on the following key dimensions:

• Valuation and FDV: Is the overall valuation of the project reasonable, and is the KOL round price relatively discounted?

• Unlock design: Is the TGE unlock ratio and linear cycle healthy, and is there a risk of concentrated selling pressure?

• Capital background: Check if there are leading VC investments and whether the institutional lineup has endorsement effects.

• Participation lineup: Which top KOLs have participated, and is there a signal of joint participation from institutions and individuals?

• Agency source: Understand whether the agency responsible for matchmaking is professional, how their past performance has been, and whether they have participated in quality projects.

• Team reputation: Does the founding team have past project experience or industry reputation, and is there a history of controversy?

• Terms requirements: Does the promotional content need to be reviewed in advance, and are there minimum guarantees or refund clauses?

Additionally, tools like XHunt can be used to analyze the reliability of projects, checking financing information, team information, follower counts of Chinese and English KOLs, community sentiment, and project influence rankings.

Conclusion: The KOL Round is a Narrow Door Left for Ordinary People in the Primary Market

From a higher-dimensional perspective, the KOL round is a financing tool that has naturally evolved in the crypto industry under the backdrop of traffic prioritization, narrative dominance, and community-driven dynamics.

It lowers the funding threshold, accelerates dissemination, and indeed helps some small projects stand out without VC support.

Of course, KOL rounds sometimes also face issues of lack of standards and ambiguous responsibilities. But from another angle, this may also be one of the few opportunities for retail investors to "squeeze into the primary market." Compared to traditional private placements dominated by elite VCs with high information barriers, KOL rounds at least possess a certain degree of liquidity and openness. Any ordinary person, as long as they can continuously produce content and have influence, has the potential to obtain quotas and truly participate in the primary pricing game.

This is not a perfect mechanism, but it is the "grassroots method" of the current crypto-native capital market. In a stage where rules are not yet formed and trust mechanisms are still being built, the KOL round, as a new market solution, still holds significance.

Because in this era, influence itself is the new capital.

About XHunt

@xhunt_ai is an AI-driven Web3 KOLFi platform that provides transparent KOL measurement metrics, instant project research, and connects project teams with trustworthy KOLs.

Recommended Reading:

$1 Billion Stablecoin Evaporation: What’s the Truth Behind the DeFi Chain Reaction?

MMT Short Squeeze Event Review: A Carefully Designed Money-Making Game

Amid Savage Harvesting, Who is Looking Forward to the Next COAI?

Click to Learn About Job Openings at ChainCatcher