not

Linea's official statement indicates that some validators supporting the Yield Boost treasury are withdrawing as a precaution due to the MetaMask staking incident. Linea emphasizes that the funds and control of the staking treasury itself have not been affected.The impact of this incident is that during the period when relevant validators withdraw and are replaced by new validators, the net staking rewards that provide funding sources for ecosystem incentives will temporarily decrease. Linea stated that it is closely monitoring the situation's progress.

Regarding the previous incident where the FlashLoopAdapter vulnerability caused a loss of approximately 114 ETH from two Safe multi-signatures, Aave founder Stani Kulechov stated that the contract with the vulnerability is not the Aave v3 contract, but rather a third-party external adapter built on top of Aave, which does not affect Aave v3 itself.Previously, SlowMist disclosed that the FlashLoopAdapter has an access control vulnerability, which attackers exploited to bypass permission checks and transfer assets from two Safe multi-signatures that enabled the module, ultimately resulting in a loss of approximately 114.09 ETH.

NEAR Protocol posted on platform X that Sal Ternullo, CEO of NEAR Treasury Company SVRN, has introduced a new proposal on the NEAR governance forum to reduce the maximum annual token issuance rate from 2.5% to 1.6% for a duration of 24 months, and to lower the staking yield from the current approximately 5.4% to about 3.5%.The proposal is currently seeking feedback from validators, House of Stake delegators, and NEAR community members, with a complete plan expected to be announced next week for voting.In response to the recent NEAR Intents security incident, NEAR Protocol further clarified that the blockchain network is operating normally, and the related incident was not caused by vulnerabilities in NEAR Protocol or the native token NEAR. The NEAR Protocol network continues to produce blocks and process transactions without any downtime.

The Vice Chair of the Federal Reserve responsible for regulatory affairs, Michelle Bowman, stated that there is currently no urgency to take further action. She pointed out that Federal Reserve officials should take the time to understand current economic trends and the impact of the interest rate hike in September on the economy before deciding whether to adjust policies. Inflation remains above the target, and there is a need for a better understanding of the trends.

The website managing the $TRUMP token event shows that the Trump memecoin will host its third "dinner" on November 22 at the Trump National Golf Club in Washington, D.C., inviting the first 185 registered investors. VIP eligibility is determined by the investor's participation in the token and will be locked in on November 12.The event is promoted as "the world's most exclusive dinner," claiming that three "legendary figures" will sit with the president, although their identities have not been disclosed. The club has made it clear that "no attendees will have the opportunity to meet the president privately." In previous events, Trump made only a brief appearance, and some participants were unable to meet him. This time, top VIPs will receive gifts such as commemorative posters and "TRUMP perfume."After the dinner announcement, the price of $TRUMP briefly rose about 10% to $2.25, then fell back, still far below the historical high of around $74. Since the token's launch, investors have lost billions of dollars, and the related controversies have become a focal point in the Senate's discussion of the "Digital Asset Market Clear Act." Democratic lawmakers had previously sought to restrict senior government officials' associations with digital assets, but that provision failed to materialize, and the bill did not advance last month.

According to Onchain Lens monitoring, Hyperliquid has bought and burned 20,200 HYPE at a volume-weighted average price of $89.05 over the past 24 hours, worth approximately $1.8 million.It has cumulatively burned 49.09 million HYPE, worth approximately $4.29 billion, accounting for 4.91% of the maximum supply; the revenue in the past 30 days is $55.89 million.

According to a recent interview with Time magazine, U.S. President Trump stated that if a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with Iran, the U.S. may intensify bombings against Iran after the midterm elections.Trump also acknowledged that the stockpile of certain types of ammunition has decreased and stated that arrangements have been made with defense contractors to replenish ammunition and expand production capacity.

The Drift Foundation announced the progress of recovering funds from the security incident on April 1, where approximately $295.4 million in user assets were stolen. The foundation has hired Mandiant, zeroShadow, and SEAL 911 to conduct investigations and fund tracking, with Mandiant identifying the attackers as the North Korean threat organization UNC6862.The stolen funds were subsequently bridged to Ethereum, with approximately 130,259 ETH dispersed across four wallets. Of these, three wallets have not transferred any funds to date, holding a total of 107,165 ETH; the other wallet transferred about 23,094 ETH to Tornado Cash on July 23. The foundation stated that approximately $9.2 million of the stolen funds have been frozen, with the relevant funds previously transferred through Tornado Cash in August, but unfreezing and returning still require legal procedures.The Drift Foundation will transfer all assets recovered through freezing, bounties, or law enforcement to the DFX recovery pool and is assessing the subsequent path of the DRIFT token within the broader ecosystem. Additionally, the foundation has partnered with Bybit to launch a public bounty program, offering a 10% bounty for successfully recovered funds.

Founder of Strategy Michael Saylor posted that he hopes Strive and all well-managed "Bitcoin-driven digital credit" issuers achieve success.Strategy is built on the same foundation as Strive: BTC belongs to digital capital, STRC and SATA belong to digital credit, and MSTR and ASST belong to digital equity. The securities structures and decisions of both parties are independent, although they will compete for individual capital allocations, they can also jointly expand long-term market opportunities.Saylor cited SIFMA data stating that by the end of 2025, the global stock market value will reach $157.8 trillion, and the fixed income debt balance will reach $160.7 trillion, with 0.1% of either market being approximately $160 billion.He proposed a threefold amplification mechanism: corporate financing to purchase supply-constrained Bitcoin can increase demand and improve the asset coverage of related companies; more issuers launching digital credit products can accumulate research, trading, and liquidity foundations, reducing the premium investors demand due to unfamiliarity, and potentially narrowing credit spreads and financing costs; more companies proving that this model can operate in different market environments may enhance market recognition of digital equity.He also emphasized that a single purchase does not guarantee Bitcoin appreciation, Bitcoin itself does not pay interest, and the profit margin between long-term asset returns and financing costs must be obtained through disciplined management; more issuers will not automatically lead to higher valuations.This model depends on a robust capital structure, prudent liquidity, transparent disclosure, and useful products. Weak issuers may undermine confidence in the entire category, while more credible issuers can meet institutional diversification investment needs and attract funds that would not otherwise enter the category.

The personal AI agent business ai.com under Crypto.com has not yet been opened to the public since its debut during the Super Bowl in February this year. According to Cointelegraph, ai.com spent $15 million on advertising during the fourth quarter of the Super Bowl to promote the launch of its AI platform, leading to a surge of users rushing to reserve personal AI agent accounts, which caused the website to crash within minutes. Nearly 8 months later, the site still displays a message indicating that due to high demand, AI agent generation is in queue. A spokesperson for Crypto.com confirmed that the platform is still under development, stating that ai.com continues to advance in stealth mode and will provide more details when it is officially released to the public.The AI agents of ai.com are positioned beyond financial scenarios. In a statement released in February, it was announced that personal agents could arrange work, send messages, operate across applications, and build projects, and it also claimed that agents could independently develop missing capabilities and share improvements within the network. Meanwhile, competitors have launched AI assistants for more specific tasks: Robinhood announced on Tuesday that it could execute automated trading within the app using AI agents, Kraken launched AI financial tools in July, and Bitget introduced the AI trading assistant GetAgent in June. Anthropic introduced computer use in Claude Cowork in March, and OpenAI launched ChatGPT Work in July.During this period, Crypto.com continues to invest in AI business.

OpenAI released the resident Agent Dots at DevDay, but the domains dot.com and dots.com are currently not owned by OpenAI. Among them, dot.com currently belongs to xAI, and opening it will directly redirect to Grok Bot, while dots.com is also not owned by OpenAI.Public WHOIS shows that dot.com was transferred in July of this year, about two months before Dots was officially released. After the news broke, the community speculated that xAI acquired the domain in advance, but there is currently no evidence to prove that they knew beforehand that OpenAI would use this name.dots.com originally belonged to the American women's clothing chain Dots. When the company went bankrupt in 2014, the domain was sold for $335,000 to an undisclosed individual buyer, and the actual holder has not received public confirmation since then.

According to Lookonchain monitoring, a certain whale purchased 30 million ENA for 8.3 million dollars three days ago, and today bought another 7.96 million ENA for 1.99 million dollars.

Jeffrey Park, Partner and Portfolio Manager at ParaFi Capital, stated that Anthropic should not proceed with an IPO based on current metrics. He mentioned that the power of American capitalism is built on a social contract: if humanity must bear its risks, the public should also share in its prosperity, rather than just footing the bill.Jeff Park pointed out that Anthropic is valued at $2 trillion but is held by only about 300 private investors. If it goes public, early growth profits will have already gone to a few private holders, while the public will have to bear the risks. In contrast, Meta is owned by over 5,000 institutions and millions of retail investors, with Facebook going public at a $100 billion valuation, allowing the public to share in a tenfold return after the IPO. He also noted that Anthropic's prospectus includes 80 pages of risk factors, warning that its technology could pose "catastrophic or existential risks." He argued that if these risks are real, the company should be partially nationalized rather than sold to retail investors; otherwise, it should remain private and self-finance until it achieves sustainable profitability.

OpenAI CEO Altman stated that Nvidia's security system is not foolproof.

Liquid Capital founder Yi Lihua posted on platform X, stating: "Currently, the market is in a pullback within an upward channel on the daily chart, which does not yet indicate a trend reversal. However, this short-term false breakout is a typical trap for bulls. The key pullback level is at 82,000. If 82,000 holds, the pullback will end and continue to rise. If 82,000 cannot hold, we may face a larger-scale pullback.""A few days ago, while observing the pullback, we made progress in one thing: not trying to earn speculative money, not trying to grab the last coin, and patiently waiting for new certainty opportunities. However, under the circumstances of a weak U.S. stock market, rising interest rates, and falling gold prices, the cryptocurrency market has relatively shown resilience, and I believe it is part of a normal rise and pullback."

User @neillee99 posted that the approximately 50 BTC held in Solv Protocol cannot be redeemed normally. The user stated that on July 8, 2026, they withdrew about 50 BTC from Binance, which was converted into SolvBTC and BTC+, aiming to earn about 3% annual yield by holding BTC+, without engaging in complex transactions.The user claimed that after the deposit, the minting and redemption functions of BTC+ suddenly paused. On July 13, a security incident occurred with BTC+, and they inquired in the official community on July 18 and July 20, but received no effective response. On July 22, Solv Protocol publicly disclosed the incident and stated that user assets were not harmed. On July 31, the project team announced the restoration of related functions, and staff informed that redemption could be initiated, but their address remained restricted, and the approximately 50 BTC corresponding assets could not be redeemed.The user stated that since July 31, they have continuously communicated through the official Discord, Telegram, and email, submitting materials such as proof of funds, transaction records, and wallet control. There have been about 60 emails exchanged between both parties, with about 50 sent by them. After contacting relevant personnel in September, they still did not receive an effective response. Their request is to lift the restrictions and restore normal redemption, while also stating that they initially came into contact with BTC+ through the BTC earnings-related page of Binance Web3 Wallet, and calling on Solv Protocol, Venus Protocol, and relevant investors and ecosystem parties to pay attention to the progress of the handling.

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang stated in an interview with CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Monday that training or learning with competitors' products is part of competition, and he refused to label AI model distillation as theft. When asked if distillation is not robbery, Huang said that it is competition. He mentioned that people can test others' products, and NVIDIA's products are sometimes taken apart to the bare bones to understand how they work; he would prefer that others do not learn from NVIDIA products, but competition makes everything better. If one does not want others to use their products, they can identify customers and discontinue services.U.S. officials have accused Chinese AI companies of using distillation, which involves training models with outputs from other models, extracting capabilities from U.S. systems. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bansen stated in July that this practice is theft and threatened to impose sanctions on overseas companies that utilize distillation to extract capabilities from U.S. models. The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment, and U.S. officials are considering measures against overseas companies that use distillation.Earlier this month, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency accused Chinese AI companies of conducting industrial-scale knowledge distillation activities, violating the terms of use for U.S. companies. AI company Anthropic stated earlier this month that it found Alibaba's Qwen series models and DeepSeek engaging in illegal distillation. The Chinese side denied these accusations.

Nate Geraci, President of ETF Store, expressed that his initial interpretation of the latest notice from the U.S. Treasury regarding 351 exchanges is not as optimistic as some industry insiders. Geraci believes that if the asset portfolio transferred into the ETF significantly differs from the ETF's own investment strategy, it may face issues, especially in cases where the related assets are quickly reduced or completely sold off through physical redemptions.He also pointed out that the Treasury's guidance is not clear regarding the specific applicable boundaries, making it currently difficult to determine which operations may be permitted. Further guidance is expected to be issued in the future.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently updated the relevant content regarding token buybacks in the frequently asked questions (FAQ) section related to cryptocurrencies. The new regulations clearly state that if there is no centralized entity behind the token buyback, then the buyback arrangement typically does not constitute an Investment Contract.