Scan to download
BTC $76,768.74 +2.67%
ETH $2,400.28 +2.44%
BNB $639.39 +2.76%
XRP $1.47 +3.94%
SOL $89.58 +4.66%
TRX $0.3242 -0.68%
DOGE $0.1011 +3.82%
ADA $0.2625 +4.43%
BCH $452.72 +2.75%
LINK $9.69 +3.36%
HYPE $44.39 -1.49%
AAVE $117.17 +8.99%
SUI $1.01 +3.27%
XLM $0.1717 +6.10%
ZEC $344.70 +0.11%
BTC $76,768.74 +2.67%
ETH $2,400.28 +2.44%
BNB $639.39 +2.76%
XRP $1.47 +3.94%
SOL $89.58 +4.66%
TRX $0.3242 -0.68%
DOGE $0.1011 +3.82%
ADA $0.2625 +4.43%
BCH $452.72 +2.75%
LINK $9.69 +3.36%
HYPE $44.39 -1.49%
AAVE $117.17 +8.99%
SUI $1.01 +3.27%
XLM $0.1717 +6.10%
ZEC $344.70 +0.11%

prosecution

The U.S. prosecution has applied to confiscate $327,000 in USDT, related to a "pig butchering" cryptocurrency fraud case

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts recently filed a civil forfeiture lawsuit seeking to recover 327,829.720952 USDT (approximately $327,000), which is allegedly related to a cryptocurrency scam conducted through a dating app.Prosecutors stated that the investigation began in the fall of 2024 when authorities discovered that a Massachusetts resident was suspected of being involved in a "romance scam." The suspect, using the name "Linda Brown," claimed to have a cryptocurrency investment opportunity after establishing a relationship with the victim for several weeks, leading the victim to transfer funds. Prosecutors claimed that the suspect used "legitimate investment" as a guise to trick the victim into transferring funds to a wallet address controlled by the suspect or an accomplice. The victim only realized the investment was a scam after failing to withdraw funds.Law enforcement noted that the stolen funds were transferred through multiple cryptocurrency wallets, then converted to USDT, and ultimately used for money laundering transactions. At the time of this case, U.S. regulators are intensifying warnings about "romance-related cryptocurrency scams." Previously, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Ohio issued a reminder titled "Cupid Doesn't Ask for Crypto" ahead of Valentine's Day, warning the public to be cautious of romance investment scams conducted through social media and instant messaging platforms.

The U.S. prosecution opposes adopting the opinion letter from the DeFi Education Fund, and the Ethereum MEV case may be re-examined

The U.S. prosecution has submitted a letter to the Southern District of New York Federal Court opposing the court's acceptance of the amicus brief submitted by the digital asset advocacy organization DeFi Education Fund while considering whether to re-examine a case related to Ethereum MEV.U.S. Acting Attorney Jay Clayton stated in a document addressed to Judge Jessica Clarke that the brief "is detached from the trial record and merely reiterates legal arguments previously rejected by the court," and should not be accepted. The case involves brothers Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, who are accused of exploiting approximately $25 million through automated MEV bots on Ethereum. In November, the court declared a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on guilt or innocence. Subsequently, the U.S. government requested the court to schedule a retrial as soon as possible in late February or early March 2026.According to the draft brief submitted by DEF on December 19, the organization supports the dismissal of the case or a not guilty verdict, arguing that such prosecutions create uncertainty and fear for DeFi developers, potentially stifling industry innovation and driving participants away. The prosecution, however, contends that these views do not provide new legal grounds. The direction of the case remains unclear. If the brothers are found guilty of the same charges in the retrial, they could face up to 20 years in prison for each count. The outcome of the case is also seen within the industry as having significant implications for MEV behavior and the related compliance boundaries.

JPEX fraud case update: The prosecution applies to transfer the first batch of 8 defendants to the Hong Kong High Court for trial

The police are investigating the cryptocurrency trading platform JPEX for suspected fraud. So far, 16 people have been prosecuted, one of whom has already appeared in court. The remaining 15 individuals are charged with conspiracy to commit fraud, money laundering, obstruction of justice, and offenses under the "Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance" for "fraudulently or recklessly inducing others to invest in virtual assets." Yesterday afternoon, they appeared in multiple cases at the Eastern Magistrates' Court, where the 15 defendants were not required to enter a plea at this time.The prosecution has applied to transfer the case of the first eight defendants to the High Court and has postponed the hearing until December 15. Among the eight defendants in the first case, the bail application of former artist Zheng Junxi was rejected by the court, and he must remain in custody, while the other seven were granted bail pending trial, with internet celebrity Lin Zuo and Chen Yingyi each bailed out for 300,000 HKD. Lin Zuo is charged with one count of fraud and an alternative charge (i.e., "fraudulently or recklessly inducing others to invest in virtual assets").The charges allege that between July 8 and September 12, 2023, he falsely represented or allowed others to make false statements and made fraudulent or reckless misrepresentations to induce others to enter into agreements related to the acquisition, disposal, subscription, or underwriting of virtual assets. The prosecution pointed out that Lin Zuo is accused of being able to successfully withdraw assets from JPEX and possessing internal information about JPEX that ordinary investors cannot access, claiming that investing in designated virtual assets through JPEX could yield a specific percentage of returns.

The U.S. prosecution has appealed the judgment in the HashFlare fraud case, involving an amount of $577 million

ChainCatcher news, according to Decrypt, U.S. federal prosecutors have submitted a request to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking to overturn the lenient sentence of the main perpetrators in the HashFlare cryptocurrency fraud case. Estonian citizens Sergei Potapenko and Ivan Turõgin are accused of defrauding 440,000 investors worldwide through a $577 million Ponzi scheme, with prosecutors arguing that the original sentence was "exceptionally lenient."The two defendants have pleaded guilty, admitting to committing fraud through false mining contracts from 2015 to 2019, misleading investors with fake profit dashboards, and using the proceeds of the fraud to purchase luxury goods and pay returns to early investors. The original judge sentenced them to only three years of supervised release and a $25,000 fine each, while prosecutors had requested a 10-year prison sentence.The judge considered factors such as the risk of "indefinite detention" that foreign defendants might face in the U.S. Legal experts analyze that the reasoning for the sentence, based on "time served, immigration risks, and compensation considerations," is reasonable, and the Ninth Circuit usually respects the discretion of district judges, making it likely that the original sentence will be upheld.Currently, $400 million has been seized for victim compensation, and this case is referred to as the "largest fraud case" in the history of the Western District of Washington.

The South Korean prosecution seeks a three-year prison sentence for actress Hwang Jung-eum, who allegedly misappropriated 4.2 billion won of public funds to invest in cryptocurrency

ChainCatcher news, according to Yonhap News Agency, the South Korean prosecution is seeking a three-year prison sentence for actress Hwang Jung-eum, who has been indicted for allegedly embezzling 4.3 billion won (approximately 3.07 million USD) and investing in virtual currency.The Jeju District Prosecutors' Office requested the court to sentence the indicted actress Hwang Jung-eum to three years in prison for the charge of embezzlement under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes during a public trial held on the 21st at the Second Criminal Division of the Jeju District Court (presided over by Judge Lim Jae-nam).Earlier reports indicated that on June 17, South Korean actress Hwang Jung-eum (transliteration) was indicted for allegedly embezzling approximately 4.2 billion won (about 3.07 million USD) to invest in virtual currency. Her management company Y1 Entertainment stated on June 17 that Hwang Jung-eum had repaid all debts in two installments on May 30 and June 5. Previously, Hwang Jung-eum withdrew a total of 4.34 billion won from Tunmin Jeong-eum Entertainment around 2022, most of which was used for cryptocurrency investments. The case involves violations of the relevant provisions regarding embezzlement in the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Specific Economic Crimes and is currently undergoing judicial proceedings.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.