Scan to download
BTC $67,209.94 +1.50%
ETH $1,950.91 +1.50%
BNB $614.91 +2.72%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $545.12 -0.26%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%
BTC $67,209.94 +1.50%
ETH $1,950.91 +1.50%
BNB $614.91 +2.72%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $545.12 -0.26%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%

status

Hyperliquid clarifies false accusations: the platform's status is transparently verifiable, will gradually decentralize, and ultimately be fully open source

Hyperliquid officially clarifies a recent article that made false accusations against it, claiming that Hyperliquid has issues with solvency, integrity, and transparency. The responses to the 10 specific allegations are as follows:System under-collateralized by $362 million: False. The author of the article ignored HyperEVM USDC (parallel to the Arbitrum bridge), with the current total USDC amount being $4.351 billion.Manipulating trading volume through TestnetSetYesterdayUserVlm: False. This is only a testnet feature and cannot be called on the mainnet.Certain users have privileges, such as fee waivers or manipulation affecting airdrops: False. All fees, balances, and transactions are visible on-chain, with no distortion mechanisms.CoreWriter "God mode" can mint, transfer funds, etc.: False. This is a way to send HyperCore operations to HyperEVM smart contracts, with no described privileges.Governance can freeze the chain, with no revocation function: Misunderstanding. Freezing is used for network upgrades, similar to hard forks on other chains. During the POPCAT event in November 2025, L1 was not frozen, only the Arbitrum bridge was automatically locked as a security measure.A single private key can instantly set oracle prices: Misunderstanding. The HIP-3 oracle is configured by the deployer and can use MPC, etc. The perpetual contracts operated by validators use a weighted median price, with no delays to ensure security.Eight undisclosed addresses control all transaction submissions: False. Some transactions have been sent directly by validators, and future upgrades will include MEV and anti-censorship mechanisms.The liquidation cartel has an unfair advantage: Misunderstanding. Only HLP can back liquidations, and deposits are permissionless, with most liquidations processed through the order book.Hidden lending protocols involving over $1 million in funds: False. Portfolio margin, lending, and HLP are publicly announced pre-alpha versions, with documentation on file.ModifyNonCirculatingSupply can change token supply: False. The HIP-1 token supply is fixed, and this function is only for display purposes, not affecting execution.

CCB responds to the transfer remark of Dogecoin being locked: detected high risk, the account will be set to "no receipt, no payment" status

Recently, Ms. Yu and her husband transferred 250 yuan in pocket money to each other through China Construction Bank, with the note "This week's Dogecoin," which led to an investigation by the bank and the locking of their accounts. The couple received calls from bank staff to verify their relationship and the reason for the transfer note, stating that the note triggered "virtual currency control," and their accounts would be set to a "no deposit, no withdrawal" status.The staff at the bank where Ms. Yu opened her account informed her that to unlock the account, she needed to submit her husband's bank statement for the past few months. After approval, she would then need to write a commitment letter, promising that the previous transactions were not related to virtual currency and that they would not participate in virtual currency transactions in the future. However, her husband strongly opposed the direct restriction on account usage and was negotiating with the staff at his bank. In response, China News Weekly called the China Construction Bank customer service for consultation, and the staff stated that they had not received any information regarding virtual currency control and suggested consulting the relevant branch for specific details.Subsequently, China News Weekly inquired at the branch of China Construction Bank in Tianjin where Ms. Yu opened her account, and the staff claimed they were unaware of the situation. Meanwhile, the staff at her husband's branch in Dalian stated that if the account involved virtual currency transactions, the bank would impose "no deposit, no withdrawal" control on the account. If the transfer note specified "Dogecoin," they would need to provide materials to prove that the note was unrelated to virtual currency. However, the issue lies in how to prove this; if only the bank statement is available, it cannot serve as valid proof. Therefore, such controlled accounts cannot be unlocked and can only be canceled.As for the specific regulations, the other party did not provide a clear response. Currently, Ms. Yu has submitted her husband's bank statement and a handwritten commitment letter and is applying to lift the account restrictions. Meanwhile, her husband's bank staff responded that after submitting their marriage certificate, they could apply to lift the restrictions. According to Xinhua News Agency, the China Internet Finance Association and six other associations jointly issued a risk warning, requiring all member units not to participate in virtual currency, real-world asset token issuance, and trading activities within the country, and reminding the public to discern risks and stay away from illegal activities.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.