Scan to download
BTC $67,666.28 +1.21%
ETH $1,966.29 +1.00%
BNB $625.66 +3.01%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $558.16 -0.58%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%
BTC $67,666.28 +1.21%
ETH $1,966.29 +1.00%
BNB $625.66 +3.01%
XRP $1.42 -4.56%
SOL $81.67 -4.53%
TRX $0.2795 -0.47%
DOGE $0.0974 -3.83%
ADA $0.2735 -4.22%
BCH $558.16 -0.58%
LINK $8.64 -2.97%
HYPE $28.98 -1.81%
AAVE $122.61 -3.42%
SUI $0.9138 -6.63%
XLM $0.1605 -4.62%
ZEC $260.31 -8.86%

institutions

Governor of the Bank of Korea: Authorities plan to allow domestic institutions to issue virtual assets, but there are still controversies surrounding stablecoins

According to the Mobile Payment Network, Bank of Korea Governor Lee Chang-yong stated at the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong that due to market pressures, authorities have allowed South Korean residents to invest in virtual assets issued overseas. Meanwhile, financial regulators are studying the establishment of a new registration system to permit domestic institutions to issue virtual assets.He pointed out that the won-denominated stablecoin is expected to be primarily used for cross-border transactions, while tokenized deposits will be more for domestic payments, but he emphasized that there are still many controversies surrounding stablecoins. He is concerned that once the won stablecoin is launched, it may be used to circumvent capital flow management measures, especially when combined with widely used and easily accessible dollar stablecoins, which poses even greater risks.Lee Chang-yong mentioned that the transaction costs of dollar stablecoins are much lower than directly using dollars, and during exchange rate fluctuations, it can easily trigger large inflows of funds; moreover, most dollar stablecoins are issued by non-bank institutions, significantly increasing regulatory difficulties. In addition, South Korea's rapid payment system has matured, and the advantages of retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) are not obvious. The central bank is promoting several pilot projects to lay out tokenized deposits and wholesale CBDCs to maintain a dual financial system.

South Korea is considering allowing domestic institutions to issue virtual assets, while stablecoins remain controversial

Li Changyong stated at the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong that, in light of market pressures, South Korean authorities have allowed domestic residents to invest in virtual assets issued overseas. The financial regulatory department is considering establishing a new registration system to allow domestic institutions to issue virtual assets.Li Changyong pointed out that if a won-denominated stablecoin is launched, its main use may focus on cross-border transactions, while tokenized deposits are more suitable for domestic payment scenarios. However, he emphasized that there is still considerable controversy surrounding stablecoins. The core concern is whether the won stablecoin could be used to circumvent capital flow management, especially when used in conjunction with dollar stablecoins.He further stated that dollar stablecoins have a wide range of applications and low entry barriers, with related transaction costs significantly lower than directly using dollars. When exchange rate fluctuations trigger changes in market expectations, funds may quickly flow into dollar stablecoins, causing large-scale capital transfers; at the same time, the participation of numerous non-bank institutions in stablecoin issuance also significantly increases regulatory difficulties.In addition, Li Changyong noted that South Korea itself has a highly developed fast payment system, so the advantages of retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) are limited. Currently, the central bank is advancing tokenized deposits and wholesale CBDC through multiple pilot projects to maintain the existing dual financial system.

Vitalik: Institutions and cypherpunks are not absolute enemies; a balance between cooperation and autonomy is needed

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik wrote that the relationship between "institutions" and "cypherpunks" is complex and needs to be understood correctly. Institutions (including governments and enterprises) are neither absolute friends nor absolute enemies; Vitalik emphasized the importance of maintaining an open attitude towards mutually beneficial cooperation while also actively safeguarding one's own interests. In this context, the core task of the Ethereum community is to build a financial, social, and identity layer to protect people's autonomy and freedom.The optimal strategy for institutions in the game is to strengthen control within a manageable scope while resisting external intrusions, which also makes them more concerned about data sovereignty and security issues than ordinary users. Vitalik predicts that institutions (including enterprises and governments) will increasingly reduce their reliance on external trust and have more guarantees over their operations.In the stablecoin sector, this means: issuers in the EU hope that the governance focus of their blockchain will not be overly centralized in the United States, and vice versa (the situation is similar in other countries/regions). Governments will promote more KYC processes, but at the same time, privacy tools will also be improved, as cypherpunks are working to enhance the performance of these tools. Institutions want to control their own wallets and even manage their own staking when staking ETH.

Analysis: Industry professionals express dissatisfaction with the CLARITY Act, criticizing excessive concessions to traditional financial institutions

The Senate Banking Committee has canceled the scheduled hearing on Thursday for the CLARITY Act (the Crypto Market Structure Act) revisions. According to crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, dissatisfaction among industry players erupted this Wednesday, with Coinbase leading the way in announcing its withdrawal of support for the bill. They complained that lawmakers made excessive concessions to banks and traditional financial institutions after proposing amendments to a lengthy 278-page bill, particularly regarding stablecoin yields and tokenization.Critics argue that the CLARITY Act itself is already biased in favor of traditional institutions. Meanwhile, some Democrats insist on establishing ethical standards for senior government officials, including the president, to prohibit them from profiting from cryptocurrency projects. Democrats have previously been at an impasse with the White House on this issue.Currently, Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott stated in a statement announcing the postponement of the meeting that "everyone is still working sincerely at the negotiating table," but did not reveal when the committee would reschedule the review. The Senate will be in recess next week for Martin Luther King Jr. Day and will reconvene the following week. During that time, the Senate Agriculture Committee is expected to hold a review, which had also been postponed from this Thursday.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.