Scan to download
BTC $77,215.21 +4.09%
ETH $2,427.36 +4.52%
BNB $640.94 +2.38%
XRP $1.48 +4.30%
SOL $89.35 +3.83%
TRX $0.3260 -0.29%
DOGE $0.1005 +3.08%
ADA $0.2625 +3.92%
BCH $455.79 +3.50%
LINK $9.69 +3.38%
HYPE $44.60 +1.71%
AAVE $117.60 +6.62%
SUI $1.01 +3.82%
XLM $0.1753 +7.15%
ZEC $335.89 -0.65%
BTC $77,215.21 +4.09%
ETH $2,427.36 +4.52%
BNB $640.94 +2.38%
XRP $1.48 +4.30%
SOL $89.35 +3.83%
TRX $0.3260 -0.29%
DOGE $0.1005 +3.08%
ADA $0.2625 +3.92%
BCH $455.79 +3.50%
LINK $9.69 +3.38%
HYPE $44.60 +1.71%
AAVE $117.60 +6.62%
SUI $1.01 +3.82%
XLM $0.1753 +7.15%
ZEC $335.89 -0.65%

responsibility

hot_img Neiro CTO responds to doubts: Choosing Gotbit as a market maker was a stopgap measure due to the urgency of going public, and is willing to take responsibility for this judgment error

ChainCatcher news, in response to crypto detective ZachXBT questioning why Neiro initially chose the notoriously poor-reputed Gotbit as a market maker, Neiro's CTO co-lead "S" stated that when Sun Yuchen's tweet led to its listing on HTX, there was actually only a few hours to find one, making time critical. The choice of Gotbit was partly because the market maker offered a retention agreement at that time, which was the most affordable option so far, and partly because the project viewed it as a quick solution for the HTX listing (with the agreement with Gotbit lasting 3 months), planning to explore other options when the budget allowed. Additionally, there was a lack of judgment experience regarding the industry; although they had heard various bad things about Gotbit, they had also heard bad things about almost everyone in the industry, making it difficult to make a judgment."S" also mentioned: "I had not had direct contact with Gotbit before, so I chose to trust them and gave them a chance. Gotbit also marketed itself as a 'meme coin friendly' market maker, which seemed like an attractive proposition.""S" concluded: "But ultimately, I take full responsibility for this; I should have been more careful. I am deeply pained by this outcome and have paid a huge price for it. At the same time, it has given us a tremendous learning opportunity, forcing us to fundamentally improve the project by collaborating with better and more market makers to reduce counterparty risk and upgrade the Neiro trading market."Previous news, on-chain detective ZachXBT commented on Neiro's announcement to terminate its partnership with market maker Gotbit, suggesting that perhaps Neiro should explain to the community why they initially chose Gotbit, given their consistently poor reputation and the substantial evidence of Gotbit's price manipulation behavior before the U.S. government accused them of fraud and market manipulation this week.

Binance responds to the dispute with WazirX's parent company Zanmai: has not acquired WazirX and does not bear any responsibility for its attacks

ChainCatcher news, Binance stated in a blog post that the WazirX platform operated by Zanmai reported that it suffered a cyber attack on July 18, 2024, resulting in user fund losses of approximately $235 million, and WazirX has been unable to fulfill customer withdrawal requests to date.Binance stated that Nischal Shetty, the main owner of Zettai, made some inaccurate statements regarding the ongoing disputes between Zettai and Binance. Shetty claimed that Binance might somehow be responsible for the losses suffered by WazirX users and creditors due to the cyber attack. Binance stated that this is incorrect, and any such claims are highly misleading. Binance stated that it has not acquired WazirX; although both parties signed a contract, the proposed transaction was never completed due to Zettai's failure to fulfill its obligations. Binance has never owned, controlled, or operated WazirX at any time, including before, during, or after the alleged hacking incident.Shetty stated that the outcome of the current dispute between Zettai and Binance could result in Binance owning WazirX, which would make Zettai's creditors creditors of Binance, meaning Binance would be responsible for WazirX users. In response, Binance believes this statement is incorrect, as Binance does not own or operate WazirX, is not a party to the agreement between WazirX and its users, does not hold any WazirX user funds, and bears no responsibility for the consequences of the cyber attack. Shetty's statements are inaccurate and misleading.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.