uld

ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood stated at a summit hosted by Robinhood in Houston that investors have traditionally "followed developers" to gauge technological trends, but now they may need to "follow agents." The AI agents she refers to are software that can perform tasks on behalf of humans, rather than just answering questions or generating text. This statement came towards the end of a discussion on AI, private markets, and technology investments.As AI agents shift from answering questions to executing operations and spending funds, the type of financial infrastructure they will use has become a focal point. SharpLink co-CEO and former BlackRock digital asset head Joseph Chalom believes that the financial system used by AI agents should not be controlled by a few banks or tech companies. He cited the example of authorized agents booking hotels, pointing out that users should be able to set spending limits, revoke authorizations at any time, and view the agents' transaction records. Additionally, users should be able to transfer the agents' identities, financial information, and permissions between different financial service providers, similar to mobile number portability.Chalom believes that open blockchains like Ethereum can provide a universal financial network for different agents, applications, and companies to use collectively, eliminating the need for each AI company to build its own closed payment system. A report from BlackRock in September also noted that AI agents could create new demands for machine-oriented payment systems, such as payment API calls, purchasing data, or renting computing power, with stablecoins and blockchain being one of the viable solutions. Coinbase's x402 is designed to enable machines to pay for online services like data or APIs.

Bonk Guy posted an analysis of the Robinhood chain ecosystem on X, urging Robinhood to strengthen its efforts on ecosystem tokens. He believes that the previous rise of the chain primarily relied on Robinhood's large retail user base and the narrative surrounding token listings, rather than technical advantages, thus creating a flywheel effect.Bonk Guy pointed out that the Robinhood chain has recently weakened, with reasons including the need for a correction after the previous large increase in ecosystem tokens, funds being diverted due to the recovery of Solana, and Robinhood's insufficient follow-up on ecosystem projects like PONS and AI.He stated that the absence of a collapse in the ecosystem after the HOOD Summit is a positive signal, and he remains optimistic about the user base and the flywheel effect of token listings in this ecosystem; if Robinhood increases listing catalysts and strengthens the distribution effect of token listings, on-chain activities will warm up in a bull market, and the next wave of increases will arrive soon.

Crypto analyst alicharts combines long-term K-line charts of mainstream crypto assets to predict the potential peaks of various mainstream cryptocurrencies in this bull market from a technical analysis perspective as follows: The first target for Bitcoin is the previous high of $125,000. If this high is broken, it may reach the upper boundary of the ascending channel—close to $190,000. The Ethereum monthly chart shows the ascending channel it has followed over the past 5 years, with the upper boundary around $5,000 being a level to watch. If this level is broken, the expected trend will point towards $8,800.The SOL monthly chart appears to be forming a cup and handle pattern, with the neckline around $295. If the monthly close breaks this line, it will strengthen the bullish case, with the potential target of this pattern expected to be close to $2,744.

Federal Reserve's Logan stated that the policy stance has been off track, and the Federal Open Market Committee should raise interest rates, targeting at least an increase of 50 basis points. Without higher rates, inflation cannot reach the Federal Reserve's 2% target.

Jeffrey Park, Partner and Portfolio Manager at ParaFi Capital, stated that Anthropic should not proceed with an IPO based on current metrics. He mentioned that the power of American capitalism is built on a social contract: if humanity must bear its risks, the public should also share in its prosperity, rather than just footing the bill.Jeff Park pointed out that Anthropic is valued at $2 trillion but is held by only about 300 private investors. If it goes public, early growth profits will have already gone to a few private holders, while the public will have to bear the risks. In contrast, Meta is owned by over 5,000 institutions and millions of retail investors, with Facebook going public at a $100 billion valuation, allowing the public to share in a tenfold return after the IPO. He also noted that Anthropic's prospectus includes 80 pages of risk factors, warning that its technology could pose "catastrophic or existential risks." He argued that if these risks are real, the company should be partially nationalized rather than sold to retail investors; otherwise, it should remain private and self-finance until it achieves sustainable profitability.

According to a report by Phoenix Technology citing Reuters, French Minister for European Affairs Benjamin Haddad stated on Tuesday that the European Union should use the billions of euros in fines imposed on Google to reduce member states' contributions to the EU budget. Haddad, in an interview with a French news channel, said: "This is a new source of income for the EU, amounting to 4.6 billion euros, and this funding should be used to automatically lower the contributions of all member states."In July of this year, Google was fined a total of 890 million euros for violating EU regulations aimed at curbing the power of large tech companies, equivalent to about 1.01 billion dollars. The recent fines have brought the total amount of fines imposed on Google by the EU for anti-competitive behavior over the past two decades to 10.38 billion euros. EU countries are currently negotiating the budget for 2028 to 2034, with the European Commission proposing a budget scale of 2 trillion euros, accounting for 1.26% of the EU's gross national income, of which about 168 billion euros will be used to repay loans raised for the post-pandemic recovery fund.

On September 28, 2026, OpenAI published a safety-related article, stating that before continuing any cutting-edge reinforcement learning training, structured safety documentation should be required. Ideally, such documentation should reach the evidence-based structured risk argument level used in safety-critical industries like aviation and nuclear power. OpenAI views this as a direction for effort while acknowledging the complexity arising from the emergence of AI capabilities, making it difficult to achieve the same level of rigor.The article focuses on cutting-edge reinforcement learning training and does not cover the broader alignment attributes required for internal and external deployments. The recommendations in the article reflect current practices, which are expected to continue evolving and are being implemented internally at OpenAI. Technical safeguards should cover model alignment, isolation, and monitoring, including avoiding speculative positive reinforcement rewards, offline alignment assessments and stress testing, preventing automated scorers from seeing thought chains, as well as multi-layer infrastructure security, sandbox red teaming, limiting high-bandwidth cross-sample communication, and immutable preservation of agent records.Operational guidelines include preemptive dissent across teams, approvals that can be vetoed by senior leadership, accountability of training leads for safety arguments and incident responses, as well as fail-safe pauses, internal oversight, audit access, and escalation by severity. In response to serious misalignment events, OpenAI proposes controlled access to original records, root cause analysis, operational and cultural reviews, and treating incident-derived assessments as regression tests; results of investigations should be made public, along with reviews and operational changes, and affected third parties should be notified as soon as possible.

Solana posted on platform X that it has gradually reduced the target Slot Time from 400 ms to 250 ms, during which the network's block skipping rate remained stable, and the downtime caused by continuous block skipping has also been shortened.However, the shorter Slot Time has led to an increase in voting delays, with nodes in Asia and South America being the most affected. Therefore, further reducing it to 200 ms before the launch of Alpenglow still requires caution.

AMC CEO Adam Aron posted on the X platform again naming Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev and Chief Legal Officer Dan Gallagher. He stated that Robinhood had previously expressed support for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the tokenization of U.S. stocks, believing that tokenized stocks should have voting rights and that companies should have the option to opt-out.Adam Aron also pointed out that it would be very "hypocritical" if Robinhood did not apply the same principles in its overseas operations, and he urged them not to go against the SEC's stance, "do not openly disrespect and provoke the SEC."

Slow Fog's Yuxian stated on platform X that the Bitget theft incident has a wide spread, involves a huge amount of money, and the related funds were quickly linked to North Korean hackers. Institutions such as Circle and Tether have promptly assisted in freezing the related funds, with Circle freezing the USDC held by the hackers.Regarding THORChain, Yuxian pointed out that when THORChain previously experienced a theft incident, it also quickly intervened in its so-called "decentralized" platform; however, in response to this major security incident in the industry, it claimed "decentralization and non-interference" and compared itself to Bitcoin and Ethereum, while continuing to earn fees from the hackers' large cross-chain transactions.He stated that decentralization should not just be a slogan; after a major security incident occurs, the key is to distinguish which issues need to be collectively addressed by the industry. He also believes that platforms like THORChain should not be easily compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum, as there are significant differences in the degree of decentralization and mechanisms of different systems.

Michael Saylor published a long article titled "Prescriptions for Prosperity in the Digital Economy," stating that artificial intelligence will significantly enhance the productivity of individuals and businesses, thus necessitating a more free environment for creating, financing, owning, and trading assets. He suggests establishing a "Digital Bill of Rights" for digital assets, which centers on granting individuals and businesses the rights to create, issue, custody, transfer, and use digital assets, while providing fundamental protections in financial privacy, asset ownership, and market access.Saylor believes that digital intelligence will drive the birth of a large number of new enterprises, and financing costs, complexity, and time costs should be reduced, while improving capital formation efficiency through means such as digital tokens. He proposes a goal of enabling 10 million new enterprises to secure financing, while also establishing clear issuance rules and risk-matched disclosure requirements.Regarding the digital dollar, Saylor advocates for allowing banks, fintech companies, and technology platforms to compete more fully in the digital dollar product space and for issuers to compete around yields. He believes that the U.S. can further expand the global reach of the dollar by allowing companies to develop more competitive dollar digital products.For Bitcoin, Saylor defines it as "digital capital," advocating for allowing banks to custody Bitcoin under clear rules and use it as collateral for providing credit, while also establishing a viable path for insurance companies to incorporate digital capital into their balance sheets and product designs.He specifically mentions that the Basel Accord applies a 1250% risk weight to certain crypto asset exposures, arguing that regulators should reassess the relevant capital requirements based on the actual risks of digital assets and specific business activities.

According to CoinDesk, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce has called for a reevaluation of the regulatory approaches to Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML). She believes that the practice of "the more data, the better" creates an overwhelming amount of information, making it harder to identify the issues that truly need attention.Peirce stated that zero-knowledge proofs can be used to verify compliance without exposing personal data. This perspective was cited in insights published by CoinDesk on its X account.

According to a report by TASS, Bogdan Shablya, head of the financial monitoring and foreign exchange regulation department of the Central Bank of Russia, stated that the Central Bank of Russia expects that after the implementation of laws related to digital currencies, the issue of illegal cryptocurrency exchanges will be resolved, and the related "gray area" should disappear before July 1, 2027.After that, the market will be clearly divided into "white" and "black" parts, with corresponding penalties implemented.

Jamie Selway, the Director of the Division of Trading and Markets at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, stated on Bloomberg TV: Tokenization and cryptocurrency have recently been politicized, but this is not their inherent nature. The success of the nation in developing these markets should receive strong bipartisan support.

Famous trader and chart analyst Peter Brandt, who successfully predicted the Bitcoin crash in 2018, shares his long-term outlook on Ethereum, stating that the current Ethereum price is around 2794 USD, indicating a potential rise to around 8600 USD after breaking through the 5000 USD resistance. Additionally, Peter Brandt believes that the long-term target for XRP could reach 5.4 USD.

Stanford University professor and founder of Landing AI, Andrew Ng, stated in a post on X that recent voices advocating for the dangers of AI have made significant progress, seemingly driven by a well-orchestrated public relations campaign, and he is concerned that this poses a setback for the field. Ng indicated that there has been no unexpected dangerous turn in AI technology, and the risk of human extinction has not increased compared to a few months ago; related theories remain in the realm of science fiction.He pointed out that the biggest change lies in cybersecurity capabilities, which should be taken seriously, but will not lead to an apocalypse. Recently, the incident where the OpenAI team deployed a swarm of agents to invade Hugging Face was exaggerated by the media, for example, describing 1,200 agents working in parallel as a miraculous ability, while computers inherently run many processes simultaneously. The key factor is the vulnerabilities in the OpenAI sandbox and monitoring; fixing these vulnerabilities and strengthening monitoring is sufficient, and there is no need to pause AI.Ng also stated that large language models and agents should not be anthropomorphized; the responsibility lies with the builders and users, not the tools themselves. Pausing AI progress will cause more harm, as opponents will not slow down; engineering needs to discover and fix problems through empirical evidence. Beneficial applications still far outweigh the risks, and development should continue.

Liquid Capital founder Jack Yi posted on the X platform, stating that he has repeatedly mentioned that July and August are the last times to buy the dip. The core idea is that the third wave of decline since 1011 is the final drop, and no one can determine where it will fall, influenced by factors like black swan events, similar to how the FTX incident caused BTC to drop excessively.However, the cycle time and volatility patterns will not be wrong; when the time comes, it is time to buy the dip. One should never expect to buy at the lowest price. As for why sometimes the statements are vague, after all, no one can be 100% accurate. Just like if you get it right ten times, no one remembers, but if you get it wrong once, it will always be on the chain. Also, outrageous rumors can ignite more enthusiasm than facts.