committee

According to official news, Tether announced that it has appointed a new independent director to the board of Bitcoin reserve company Twenty One Capital (XXI) to fill the previous vacancy in the audit committee. The company stated that this appointment complies with the independence requirements of the SEC's Securities Exchange Act Rule 10A-3 and the New York Stock Exchange listing rules.This vacancy arose after Tether acquired the shares of XXI held by SoftBank Group on May 20, leading to the termination of the governance agreement between the two parties, and the resignation of the directors appointed by SoftBank, one of whom was a member of the audit committee.It was introduced that Twenty One Capital currently holds over 43,500 bitcoins and is positioned as a vertically integrated Bitcoin company, with business covering Bitcoin mining, asset reserves, capital markets, and financial services.Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino stated that XXI is building one of the most important Bitcoin companies in the world, and therefore the company prioritizes ensuring that the board has an independent oversight mechanism that meets SEC and NYSE requirements to match its strong balance sheet.

According to Bloomberg, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee is preparing legislation to establish a cryptocurrency tax structure, which could be released as early as Friday, followed by a hearing early next week. Committee Chairman Jason Smith will prioritize the development of a digital asset tax framework, with the Treasury Department also involved in the process.The committee is expected to release seven bills addressing when tokens obtained through mining or staking will be taxed, exempting certain stablecoin transactions from capital gains tax, equal tax treatment for digital assets and securities (including charitable donations), allowing foreign investors to trade U.S. securities without being taxed as domestic entities, and expanding wash sale rules to digital assets.

According to The Block, the UK's House of Lords Financial Services Regulatory Committee pointed out that the UK is lagging behind the US and the EU in stablecoin regulation.The committee urged the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to revise several proposals, including reconsidering the holding limits of £20,000 for individuals and $10 million for businesses, the 40% zero-interest central bank deposit reserve requirement, and restrictions on commercial bank issuance. It also suggested that the FCA review the k-factor capital requirements scaled by issuance rather than risk.

According to CoinDesk, the UK House of Lords Financial Services Regulatory Committee has called on the Bank of England to reconsider the proposed limits on stablecoin holdings in its latest report. The committee suggested that rather than imposing a holding cap in advance, it would be better to monitor market growth and only implement restrictions when financial stability risks clearly necessitate it. The Bank of England had previously proposed a holding limit of £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses for each stablecoin. The report also questioned the rules on reserve assets, stating that this could have a significant impact on the commercial viability of UK stablecoin issuers. The Deputy Governor of the Bank of England acknowledged last month that the proposed holding limits and reserve requirements were "too conservative" and stated that they are exploring other ways to manage the risks associated with stablecoins.

According to Protos, Bitcoin treasury company Twenty One Capital received formal notification from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) that it was deemed non-compliant due to insufficient independent directors on the audit committee and must complete rectification by June 5; otherwise, it will be marked as BC (below compliance standards) starting June 9.Previously, Tether completed the acquisition of approximately 89.1 million Class A shares held by SoftBank and terminated the related governance agreement, resulting in the resignation of two directors appointed by SoftBank, one of whom was a member of the audit committee. This left the company with only one independent director on the audit committee during the transition period, which does not meet NYSE requirements. Twenty One Capital stated that it will appoint new independent audit committee members as soon as possible.

The Shanghai Stock Exchange Listing Review Committee held its 31st listing review meeting of 2026. The review results indicate that Yushu Technology Co., Ltd.'s initial public offering meets the issuance conditions, listing conditions, and information disclosure requirements.

According to the announcement from the Shanghai Stock Exchange, Changxin Technology's IPO on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board has been approved by the listing committee meeting. It is reported that Changxin Technology is a leading DRAM memory chip company in China.

According to BBX data, the pressure from market regulation suddenly intensified over the weekend, and institutional-level crypto derivatives product lines expanded simultaneously. The core dynamics are as follows:On May 22, James Comer (Republican, Kentucky), Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, officially issued investigation letters to Kalshi (privately held) and Polymarket (privately held), initiating a formal congressional investigation into insider trading on prediction market platforms. The investigation focuses on two suspicious bets: one betting on the early capture of Venezuelan President Maduro, and another betting on the direction of the Iranian conflict. Both transactions recorded unusually large amounts just hours before the related events were made public. According to media reports, the Wisconsin Attorney General has recently listed Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: $HOOD), along with Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com, as defendants, accusing them of providing unlicensed sports betting services in Wisconsin. This is the latest escalation of the prediction market facing legal challenges in 13 states to congressional scrutiny. Both Kalshi and Polymarket stated their willingness to cooperate with the committee's investigation, asserting that their platforms have robust anti-insider trading mechanisms.On May 23, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) officially approved a proposal submitted by Nasdaq, Inc. (NASDAQ: $NDAQ) to launch cash-settled Bitcoin index options on its Philadelphia Stock Exchange, which does not involve physical delivery of Bitcoin. This product will allow institutional investors to hedge or invest in Bitcoin price fluctuations through standardized options contracts, filling a market gap for cash-settled Bitcoin index derivatives on regulated exchanges in the U.S. The timing of the approval coincided with significant fluctuations in Bitcoin over the week (with a low of $74,500 and a high rebound to $77,800), reflecting the accelerating release of genuine demand for volatility management tools in the market.

According to CNBC, James Comer, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has launched an investigation into the prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket, requesting both companies to explain their measures to prevent insider trading, including identity verification, geographic restriction enforcement, and abnormal trading monitoring mechanisms. Comer stated that internal records of the relevant platforms are key evidence for identifying improper traders and determining whether the platforms fulfill their legal obligations.Previously, Polymarket was reported to have suspicious trading related to U.S. events concerning Iran and Venezuela; Kalshi had also suspended the accounts of three congressional candidates who were betting on their own election results on the platform. Comer has requested both companies to submit relevant documents by June 5.

A petition in South Korea calling for the abolition of a 22% tax on cryptocurrency investment gains has reached the threshold of 50,000 signatures and will be reviewed by the National Assembly's Finance and Economy Planning Committee. This tax rate is set to take effect in January 2027. The petitioners argue that this tax system imposes financial and reporting burdens on investors while limiting upward mobility opportunities for young people who have been excluded from the housing market due to soaring property prices.The petitioners point out that imposing a 22% tax rate on cryptocurrency gains while offering more favorable tax treatment to other asset classes will weaken South Korea's share in the cryptocurrency market. They warn that forcibly imposing short-term taxes could lead to industry shrinkage and the outflow of capital and talent in the long run.Approximately 32% of South Korea's population holds cryptocurrency, but the market is contracting. The total value of cryptocurrency assets held by South Koreans has decreased from about 121.8 trillion won in January 2025 to about 60.6 trillion won in February 2026, and the daily trading volume of the five major exchanges has dropped from $11.6 billion in December 2024 to $3 billion in February.

According to Digital Asset, Jeong Tae-ho, a Democratic Party official from the National Assembly's Finance and Economy Planning Committee in South Korea, stated that the taxation of digital assets "has already been postponed and should be implemented as planned," and mentioned that internal party discussions will begin once the tax reform proposal is submitted to the committee.This statement marks a significant shift from his more reserved stance a month ago. The South Korean government has also officially confirmed that it will impose taxes on the transfer and rental income of digital assets starting January 1, 2027. Several hardline lawmakers within the Democratic Party have recently voiced their support for advancing the timeline as scheduled.

According to crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, the Clarity Act has passed the U.S. Senate Banking Committee with a vote of 15 in favor and 9 against, with Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks voting in favor. The next step for the bill is to be submitted to the full Senate for a vote.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee is currently holding a key hearing on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (referred to as the Clarity Act), where the committee will discuss and vote on dozens of amendments and decide whether to advance the bill to the full Senate for consideration. The bill aims to clarify the regulatory authority of the SEC and CFTC over digital assets and establish a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency market structure.During the meeting, Senator Cynthia Lummis stated that the Clarity Act is "one of the most challenging pieces of legislation" she has participated in, noting that the bill has undergone long-term bipartisan negotiations and involves issues such as stablecoin yields, anti-money laundering, and enforcement authority. Elizabeth Warren, on the other hand, stated that the bill is "not ready" and criticized it for having loopholes in anti-money laundering and sanctions enforcement. Additionally, the committee passed an amendment regarding an AI regulatory sandbox by a vote of 15 to 9, while Warren's proposed amendment concerning the sanctions authority over mixers like Tornado Cash was not passed, with a vote of 11 to 13.In the market, Bitcoin briefly surpassed $81,000 during the meeting, and the S&P 500 index also reached a historic high.

According to BBX data, institutional demand for Bitcoin ETFs maintained strong momentum yesterday. Today, both houses of Congress are advancing cryptocurrency legislation simultaneously for the first time, with the core dynamics as follows:The U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF recorded a total net inflow of approximately $358.1 million yesterday (May 13), with BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE: $BLK) subsidiary iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ: $IBIT) seeing a single-day net inflow of $269.3 million, the strongest single-day data in recent weeks; the overall U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF has recorded net positive inflows for seven consecutive weeks, further reinforcing the structural signal of institutional capital returning. Bitcoin closed above $80,000 yesterday, with a year-to-date increase of about 14%, and market sentiment remains relatively optimistic on the eve of the CLARITY Act markup.The House Ways & Means Committee held a closed-door meeting today (May 14) on cryptocurrency tax reform in sync with the Senate Banking Committee's CLARITY Act markup, covering topics such as the treatment of capital gains tax on crypto assets, tax reporting responsibilities for DeFi protocols, and the tax classification of Bitcoin mining and staking income; this marks the first time in 2026 that both houses of Congress are advancing cryptocurrency regulatory legislation on the same day, indicating that cryptocurrency regulatory legislation has expanded from a single market structure issue to a complete legislative ecosystem of "regulatory framework + tax system."

According to The Block, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee has released an updated 309-page text of the Clarity Act, which is set to be reviewed and voted on later this week. The new text includes language related to restrictions on stablecoin rewards, as well as provisions from the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, clarifying that non-custodial developers do not fall under the category of money transmitters. Coinbase, which previously withdrew its support due to controversies over the stablecoin rewards provisions, has now shifted to support, but banking groups still believe the restrictions are insufficient.Meanwhile, the bill still does not include ethical constraints regarding profits from digital assets for the president and other federal officials. Democrats have stated that without relevant compromises, the bill will struggle to gain support.

According to Cointelegraph citing Bloomberg, the U.S. House fundraising committee will hold a closed-door bipartisan briefing on cryptocurrency tax issues this Thursday.

According to Crypto in America, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee has scheduled a formal markup of the cryptocurrency market structure bill, the Clarity Act, for Thursday. The final text of the relevant provisions is expected to be published before the meeting, and lawmakers must submit amendments by the deadline.Previously, the initial review was temporarily halted due to opposition from industry insiders, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, regarding the stablecoin yield provisions. Currently, cryptocurrency institutions like Coinbase generally accept the new text, but some banks serving retail customers are still sending letters to the Senate through industry associations, requesting further tightening of the "interest on deposits" space for stablecoins to prevent depositor migration.Meanwhile, some Democratic lawmakers may vote against the bill in its entirety during the committee stage due to dissatisfaction with potential conflicts of interest clauses related to Trump and his family involving crypto. This could lead to the bill passing through the committee along party lines, but facing uncertainty in garnering bipartisan support in the full chamber later.

According to The Block, Rob Nichols, the CEO of the American Bankers Association (ABA), sent a letter to bank executives on Sunday evening urging them to contact senators to further tighten the provisions related to stablecoin rewards before the Senate Banking Committee's markup vote on Thursday.Nichols warned that the current draft fails to effectively prevent crypto companies from offering "interest-like rewards" to users, which could lead to significant outflows of bank deposits, threatening economic growth and financial stability.The current draft, negotiated by Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Thom Tillis, prohibits paying interest or returns to users holding stablecoins but allows rewards linked to real activities or transactions, a provision that has received support from Coinbase. The banking industry groups believe that the related exceptions contain loopholes that could be exploited and jointly sent a letter on May 8 to Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Democrat Elizabeth Warren, requesting technical revisions to the wording of the provisions.