Scan to download
BTC $60,434.20 -0.56%
ETH $1,551.27 -2.36%
BNB $572.24 -1.06%
XRP $1.09 -1.42%
SOL $61.52 -4.72%
TRX $0.3204 -0.46%
DOGE $0.0810 -0.92%
ADA $0.1577 -0.60%
BCH $217.26 +0.34%
LINK $7.31 -0.39%
HYPE $57.80 -4.29%
AAVE $60.01 -2.47%
SUI $0.7110 +1.96%
XLM $0.2003 +7.50%
ZEC $340.70 +1.31%
BTC $60,434.20 -0.56%
ETH $1,551.27 -2.36%
BNB $572.24 -1.06%
XRP $1.09 -1.42%
SOL $61.52 -4.72%
TRX $0.3204 -0.46%
DOGE $0.0810 -0.92%
ADA $0.1577 -0.60%
BCH $217.26 +0.34%
LINK $7.31 -0.39%
HYPE $57.80 -4.29%
AAVE $60.01 -2.47%
SUI $0.7110 +1.96%
XLM $0.2003 +7.50%
ZEC $340.70 +1.31%

quests

first_img CFTC acknowledges that it should not sue Gemini and jointly requests the court to withdraw the consent order

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Tuesday that it has jointly filed a motion with Gemini Trust Company LLC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, requesting the dismissal of a previous judgment against Gemini.The case was originally filed in June 2022, and the parties reached a consent order in January 2025. After a comprehensive review, the CFTC concluded that the lawsuit should not have been filed and would not be filed under current enforcement standards.The review identified six major issues: the complaint was primarily based on statements from a whistleblower of questionable credibility; the investigation targeted Gemini as a victim of fraud rather than the alleged fraudster; there were serious doubts about the strength of the evidence against Gemini; relevant supporting materials were concealed and not submitted to the commissioners during the CFTC's vote on the complaint; the litigation team invoked deliberative process privilege to prevent Gemini from obtaining evidence necessary for its defense; and personnel improperly used CFTC regulatory power to create leverage for settlement.The CFTC determined that continuing to enforce the forward-looking provisions of the consent order is neither consistent with its mission nor in the public interest, and that the non-forward-looking provisions of the consent order (such as civil penalties) have been fulfilled. The parties jointly request the court to vacate the remaining forward-looking provisions.

CZ requests the bankruptcy court to dismiss the $1.76 billion lawsuit filed by the FTX trust

ChainCatcher news, according to market reports, CZ has become the latest Binance-related individual to request a bankruptcy court to dismiss the FTX trust allegations. The trust is attempting to recover $1.76 billion improperly transferred by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF). CZ filed a motion in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Delaware on Monday, stating that the FTX trust and FTX Digital Markets Ltd. cannot prove he has a "domicile" in Delaware, as he is a resident of the UAE and not subject to the jurisdiction of that state.CZ stated in the documents: "These allegations are far removed from Delaware, and even from the U.S. mainland, and the relevant laws do not have extraterritorial effect, thus are not applicable."As early as November 2024, the FTX trust and FTX Digital Markets had filed a lawsuit against Binance and its executives due to a share buyback agreement from July 2021. In July of this year, two former Binance executives, Samuel Wenjun Lim and Xiao Dinghua, also requested the court to remove themselves from the lawsuit.The FTX trust alleges that Binance and the aforementioned executives obtained funds through the share buyback transaction when they sold approximately 20% of FTX's international business and 18.4% of FTX's U.S. business. According to court documents, to complete this transaction, Alameda Ltd. (registered in the British Virgin Islands) transferred funds to Binance. The Binance-related entities are registered in Ireland, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands, so CZ's team pointed out that this transaction has a clear "extraterritorial nature" and should not be subject to U.S. law.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.