Scan to download
BTC $76,179.67 +2.08%
ETH $2,369.98 +1.25%
BNB $635.87 +2.32%
XRP $1.46 +3.17%
SOL $88.84 +4.07%
TRX $0.3241 -0.74%
DOGE $0.1000 +3.53%
ADA $0.2604 +4.03%
BCH $451.82 +2.76%
LINK $9.61 +3.12%
HYPE $44.11 -2.09%
AAVE $116.71 +9.27%
SUI $1.00 +3.21%
XLM $0.1706 +5.59%
ZEC $340.54 -0.95%
BTC $76,179.67 +2.08%
ETH $2,369.98 +1.25%
BNB $635.87 +2.32%
XRP $1.46 +3.17%
SOL $88.84 +4.07%
TRX $0.3241 -0.74%
DOGE $0.1000 +3.53%
ADA $0.2604 +4.03%
BCH $451.82 +2.76%
LINK $9.61 +3.12%
HYPE $44.11 -2.09%
AAVE $116.71 +9.27%
SUI $1.00 +3.21%
XLM $0.1706 +5.59%
ZEC $340.54 -0.95%

isp

After Kalshi filed an appeal, the compliance dispute in the prediction market may be handed over to the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral arguments from lawyers representing the prediction market platform Kalshi and Nevada authorities regarding Nevada's ban on the platform's event contracts. This appeal stems from a lower court ruling that prohibited Kalshi from offering certain event-based contracts in Nevada based on the claim that Kalshi requires a license.The appellate court judges responsible for Thursday's oral arguments and Kalshi's lawyers acknowledged that there have been several state-level enforcement actions against Kalshi and other prediction market platforms, including criminal charges filed in Arizona. However, a federal court last week blocked Arizona authorities from enforcing the state's gambling laws against Kalshi's event contracts."I believe existing case law does indicate that what we want to avoid here is state courts and federal courts simultaneously considering the exact same issue and potentially reaching different conclusions," said Colleen Sinzdak, representing Kalshi.The core argument of Kalshi's debate is that the platform's event contracts fall under "swap" transactions and should be regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, rather than state gambling regulators. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig supported this position in the case involving Crypto.com's prediction market and Nevada authorities.Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal predicted that this case may be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. "The questions in the oral arguments are not a reliable signal of the court's leanings; nonetheless, I stand by my long-standing prediction that the Supreme Court will rule on whether sports contracts on designated contract markets fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the CFTC as swap transactions."

J.P. Morgan: Negotiations on the CLARITY Act have entered the final stage, with disputes narrowed down to 2-3 core issues

JPMorgan analysts have stated that negotiations for the U.S. "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" (i.e., the CLARITY Act) have entered the final stages, with both sides reaching compromises on a few remaining contentious points. The number of disputes has been reduced from over a dozen to 2-3 core issues, with discussions on stablecoin rewards being "in a good place." While banks express concerns about stablecoins offering similar yields to deposits, there is an overall bipartisan compromise trend. JPMorgan believes that "there is no perfect bill," and once passed, the bill will provide important regulatory clarity for the integration of digital assets into the U.S. financial system.The "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" is currently in advanced negotiations in the U.S. Senate, with Senate staff stating that the draft is "very close" to resolution, but the final text has not yet been released, nor has a formal vote been scheduled. The remaining major disagreements focus on stablecoin rewards, DeFi regulation, and token classification issues. Although optimism is rising, there is still a risk of delays due to the 2026 midterm elections, which could lead to a more uncertain political environment. If the bill is ultimately passed, it will delineate the regulatory authority between the SEC and CFTC, providing a long-term regulatory framework for stablecoins, DeFi, and the entire cryptocurrency industry.

The Aave governance dispute escalates, ACI releases the "Aave Labs Audit" report, and tensions rise ahead of the $51 million grant proposal

The Aave community governance conflict has escalated again. The Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) and its founder Marc Zeller released an "audit" report targeting Aave Labs on the eve of a vote for a $51 million proposal known as "the largest funding request in Aave's history," sparking widespread discussion.ACI stated on social media that before the "$51M Aave Will Win" proposal enters Snapshot voting, the community should examine Aave Labs' past performance and its cumulative use of approximately $86 million in funds. Zeller mentioned that ACI has already released its own transparency report and evaluated Aave Labs using the framework of "what was delivered, how much it cost, and what the returns were." The report pointed out that Aave Labs has a cumulative "total capitalization" of about $86 million, which includes: $16.2 million from the 2017 ICO financing, $32.5 million from VC funding rounds, $31.93 million from direct DAO grants, and approximately $5.5 million categorized as "unapproved" swap fees.Zeller also noted that the founding team once held 23% of the initial supply of LEND (which later migrated to AAVE), but the current AAVE holdings have not been publicly disclosed. The report questions why Aave Labs has not released an "accountability report" that includes cost-output ratios, financial disclosures, and wallet transparency, arguing that information disclosure remains insufficient in the context of receiving large amounts of funding over the long term.
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.