BTC $84,803.55 +0.19%
ETH $2,693.64 +0.51%
BNB $783.20 +1.87%
XRP $1.49 +0.03%
SOL $120.08 +0.82%
TRX $0.3353 +0.29%
DOGE $0.0927 -0.47%
ADA $0.2439 -1.56%
BCH $317.92 +1.71%
LINK $14.02 +0.61%
HYPE $89.61 +0.73%
AAVE $181.54 -0.07%
SUI $1.17 -0.15%
XLM $0.2152 -0.56%
ZEC $1,303.83 -1.39%
AAPL $333.32 -0.01%
AMZN $252.37 +0.17%
GOOGL $343.84 +0.17%
MSFT $517.91 +0.05%
META $730.92 +0.47%
NVDA $234.88 +0.21%
TSLA $371.55 +0.12%
SNDK $1,716.27 -0.34%
INTC $117.02 -1.51%
SPCX $158.83 -0.08%
MU $1,066.23 -0.24%
AMD $634.02 -0.26%
BTC $84,803.55 +0.19%
ETH $2,693.64 +0.51%
BNB $783.20 +1.87%
XRP $1.49 +0.03%
SOL $120.08 +0.82%
TRX $0.3353 +0.29%
DOGE $0.0927 -0.47%
ADA $0.2439 -1.56%
BCH $317.92 +1.71%
LINK $14.02 +0.61%
HYPE $89.61 +0.73%
AAVE $181.54 -0.07%
SUI $1.17 -0.15%
XLM $0.2152 -0.56%
ZEC $1,303.83 -1.39%
AAPL $333.32 -0.01%
AMZN $252.37 +0.17%
GOOGL $343.84 +0.17%
MSFT $517.91 +0.05%
META $730.92 +0.47%
NVDA $234.88 +0.21%
TSLA $371.55 +0.12%
SNDK $1,716.27 -0.34%
INTC $117.02 -1.51%
SPCX $158.83 -0.08%
MU $1,066.23 -0.24%
AMD $634.02 -0.26%

泰达

全部
文章
快讯

帮人炒“泰达币”亏了十几万?台州市黄岩区人民法院:合同无效,全数返还

链捕手消息,近日台州市黄岩法院审结一起委托合同纠纷案件,黄甲经人介绍与张乙签订了《数字货币量化委托协议书》一份,约定黄甲以个人名义转账给张乙20万元用于购买泰达币(USDT),由张乙投资运作,协议到期后保底归还黄甲合同签订时购买的等量数字货币;张乙定期向黄甲结算相应收益,合同到期时结算所委托的数字货币;协议期限为一年。然而,市场行情并未像黄甲预期的那般良好,张乙亦无法控制虚拟货币市场的行情变化,陆陆续续返还给黄甲投资款95760元,剩下的款项迟迟未能返还给,眼见投资回本无望的黄甲将张乙起诉到了法院,要求其返还投资款,并赔偿相应的利息损失。   台州市黄岩区人民法院裁定,本案案涉标的物本身不具有合法性,故原、被告关于该交易物的委托托管行为亦不受法律保护,因此原、被告签订的《数字货币量化委托协议书》属于无效合同。被告依无效合同取得的财产应当返还给原告,被告应返还原告剩余的104240元投资款。原告应当明知虚拟货币的投资不受国家法律所保护,而仍然委托被告进行投资,本身存在过错,故其请求赔偿利息等损失的主张于法无据,不予支持。(来源链接)
app_icon
ChainCatcher 与创新者共建Web3世界